Purpose Planned interim analysis of GENESIS; a prospective pilot study investigating the role of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee using permanent microspheres. Methods Thirty-eight patients, median age = 60 (45–83), attended for GAE using 100–300 μm permanent microspheres. All patients had mild to moderate knee OA, resistant to conservative treatments over 6 months. Knee MRI was performed at baseline, and 12 months, enabling semi-quantitative analysis using Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (0–100 mm) were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months (n = 32), and 1-year (n = 16). Adverse events were recorded prospectively. Results Technical success of accessing and embolizing the target genicular arteries was 84%. Six patients were not embolized: four due to a presumed risk of non-target embolization, and two due to a lack of hyperaemic target. Mean VAS improved from 60 (SD = 20, 95% CI 53–66) at baseline to 36 (SD = 24, 95% CI 28–44) at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 45 (SD = 30, 95% CI 30–60) at 1-year (p < 0.05). All KOOS subscales showed a significant improvement at 6-weeks, 3-months, and 1-year follow-up, except function in daily living, which reached borderline significance (p = 0.06) at 1-year. Four patients experienced mild self-limiting skin discoloration over the embolized territory. One patient experienced a small self-limiting groin haematoma. WORMS scores at 1-year follow-up showed significant improvement in synovitis (p < 0.05). There were no cases of osteonecrosis. Conclusion GAE using permanent microspheres in patients with mild to moderate knee OA is safe, with potential efficacy at early follow-up.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Colorectal cancer often presents with obstruction needing urgent, potentially life-saving decompression. The comparative efficacy and safety of endoluminal stenting versus emergency surgery as initial treatment for such patients is uncertain. Methods Patients with left-sided colonic obstruction and radiological features of carcinoma were randomized to endoluminal stenting using a combined endoscopic/fluoroscopic technique followed by elective surgery 1–4 weeks later, or surgical decompression with or without tumour resection. Treatment allocation was via a central randomization service using a minimization procedure stratified by curative intent, primary tumour site, and severity score (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation). Co-primary outcome measures were duration of hospital stay and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were stoma formation, stenting completion and complication rates, perioperative morbidity, 6-month survival, 3-year recurrence, resource use, adherence to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Analyses were undertaken by intention to treat. Results Between 23 April 2009 and 22 December 2014, 245 patients from 39 hospitals were randomized. Stenting was attempted in 119 of 123 allocated patients (96.7 per cent), achieving relief of obstruction in 98 of 119 (82.4 per cent). For the 89 per cent treated with curative intent, there were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative mortality (3.6 per cent (4 of 110) versus 5.6 per cent (6 of 107); P = 0.48), or duration of hospital stay (median 19 (i.q.r. 11–34) versus 18 (10–28) days; P = 0.94) between stenting followed by delayed elective surgery and emergency surgery. Among patients undergoing potentially curative treatment, stoma formation occurred less frequently in those allocated to stenting than those allocated to immediate surgery (47 of 99 (47.5 per cent) versus 72 of 106 (67.9 per cent); P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity, critical care use, quality of life, 3-year recurrence or mortality between treatment groups. Conclusion Stenting as a bridge to surgery reduces stoma formation without detrimental effects. Registration number: ISRCTN13846816 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Our aims were to first assess uptake of the modified safety checklist (SC) for interventional radiology (IR), identify obstacles to using the SC, and then apply changes to local policy to reach maximum compliance. Retrospective data collection was performed of all patients who underwent an interventional procedure in the interventional suite at the Royal Berkshire Hospital in February, March and May 2014. Barriers to a SC: a lack of awareness about the SC; lack of training in how to complete the SC; lack of leadership—no team member had been given the role of promoting the SC and collecting and collating the SC; attitude of staff—some team members felt that the SCs were time consuming and further bureaucracy; out-of-hours procedures involved staff from outside departments who were not familiar with the SC; paper copies of the completed SCs were being misplaced. Results: February 2014 = 79%; staff education of the importance of the modified World Health Organization (WHO) checklist disseminated in the interventional suite and at clinical governance; each day a designated ‘SC champion’ in the interventional suite has the responsibility for overseeing the WHO checklist is completed for each patient; the use of a clipboard for storing checklists, amalgamated and scored at the end of each day. Any checklists not completed are highlighted and discussed with the consultant. March 2014 = 95%; junior nurse involvement in auditing to improve awareness and engagement; out-of-hours interventional radiologist ensuring that the checklist is completed for each patient. May 2014 = 100%.