Breast cancer is the main cause of cancer-related death in women in the world. Because autophagy is a known survival pathway for cancer cells, its inhibition is currently being explored in clinical trials for treating several types of malignancies. In breast cancer, autophagy has been shown to be necessary for the survival of cancer cells from the triple negative subtype (TNBC), which has the worst prognosis among breast cancers and currently has limited therapeutic options. Autophagy has also been involved in the regulation of protein secretion and, of importance for this work, the inhibition of autophagy is known to promote the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines from distinct cell types. We found that the inhibition of autophagy in TNBC cell lines induced the secretion of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a pro-tumorigenic cytokine involved in breast cancer invasion and immunomodulation. MIF secretion was dependent on an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by the inhibition of autophagy. Importantly, MIF secreted from autophagy-deficient cells increased the migration of cells not treated with autophagy inhibitors, indicating that autophagy inhibition in cancer cells promoted malignancy in neighboring cells through the release of secreted factors, and that a combinatorial approach should be evaluated for cancer therapy.

The dopamine receptors (DRs) family includes 5 members with differences in signal transduction and ligand affinity. Abnormal DRs expression has been correlated multiple tumors with their clinical outcome. Thus, it has been proposed that DRs-targeting drugs—developed for other diseases as schizophrenia or Parkinson’s disease—could be helpful in managing neoplastic diseases. In this review, we discuss the role of DRs and the effects of DRs-targeting in tumor progression and cancer cell biology using multiple high-prevalence neoplasms as examples. The evidence shows that DRs are valid therapeutic targets for certain receptor/disease combinations, but the data are inconclusive or contradictory for others. In either case, further studies are required to define the precise role of DRs in tumor progression and propose better therapeutic strategies for their targeting.

Autophagy is an intracellular recycling process active in eukaryotic cells that involves the formation of an autophagosome which delivers cytoplasmic components to the lysosome for degradation. This process occurs at low rates under basal conditions, but it can be induced by diverse types of stress such as starvation, hypoxia, metabolic disorders or in response to hormones, including leptin. Leptin is considered a pro-tumorigenic protein whose circulating levels have been related to bad prognosis in obese breast cancer patients. It has been recently demonstrated that leptin can induce autophagy in cancer cell lines from different tissues, suggesting that autophagy could modulate the pro-tumorigenic effects associated with leptin. In this study, the role of autophagy in leptin-induced proliferation, migration, apoptosis and ERK phosphorylation in breast cancer cell lines was evaluated. Although leptin differentially induced autophagy in the breast cancer cell lines tested, autophagy inhibition reduced leptin-induced cell proliferation in MCF7 cells and decreased cell migration, ERK activation, and impaired morphological changes in both cell lines. Our data demonstrates an important role for basal autophagy or leptin-induced autophagy in leptin-induced migration and ERK phosphorylation in breast cancer cell lines, suggesting a potential use for the inhibition of autophagy in breast cancer associated with obesity.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are tumor cells that share functional characteristics with normal and embryonic stem cells. CSCs have increased tumor-initiating capacity and metastatic potential and lower sensitivity to chemo- and radiotherapy, with important roles in tumor progression and the response to therapy. Thus, a current goal of cancer research is to eliminate CSCs, necessitating an adequate phenotypic and functional characterization of CSCs. Strategies have been developed to identify, enrich, and track CSCs, many of which distinguish CSCs by evaluating the expression of surface markers, the initiation of specific signaling pathways, and the activation of master transcription factors that control stemness in normal cells. We review and discuss the use of reporter gene systems for identifying CSCs. Reporters that are under the control of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1, CD133, Notch, Nanog homeobox, Sex-determining region Y-box 2, and POU class 5 homeobox can be used to identify CSCs in many tumor types, track cells in real time, and screen for drugs. Thus, reporter gene systems, in combination with in vitro and in vivo functional assays, can assess changes in the CSCs pool. We present relevant examples of these systems in the evaluation of experimental CSCs-targeting therapeutics, demonstrating their value in CSCs research.

Background: Abnormal expression of dopamine receptors (DRs) has been described in multiple tumors, but their roles in breast cancer are inconclusive or contradictory since evidence of pro-and antitumoral effects have been reported. Herein, we analyzed the expression of DRs in breast cancer, especially in the subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), and evaluated the functional role of the receptors by pharmacological targeting. Methods: Expression of DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DRD4 and DRD5 was investigated in human breast tumors and cancer cell lines using public databases. Correlation between gene expression and clinical outcome was studied by Kaplan-Mayer analyses. By flow cytometry, we assessed DRD1, DRD2, and DRD4 expression in cultures of MCF-7 (luminal) and MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative) cells. Using the previously reported SORE6 reporter system we examined the differential expression of DRD1, DRD2, and DRD4 in CSCs and tumor-bulk cells. The effect of pharmacological modulation of DRs on stemness and cell migration was studied by quantification of the reporter-positive fraction and wound healing assays, respectively. Results: DRD1, DRD2 and DRD4 transcripts were expressed in breast tumors. DRD4 was overexpressed compared to normal tissue and showed prognostic value. DRD1, DRD2 and DRD4 transcripts were also found in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, but only DRD1 and DRD4 proteins were detected. DRD4 was underexpressed in CSCs compared to tumor-bulk cells, whereas DRD1 was found only in the CSCs fraction, suggesting that those receptors may have relevance in stemness control. Subtoxic concentrations of DRD1targeting compounds did not induced significant changes in the CSCs pool. On the other hand, DRD4 inhibition by Haloperidol slightly increased the CSCs content but also reduced cell migration. Conclusions: Pharmacological modulation of DRD1 in MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells seems to be irrelevant for stemness maintenance. DRD4 reduced expression in breast CSCs or its inhibition by Haloperidol favors CSCs-pool expansion. DRD4 inhibition can also reduce cell migration, indicating that DRD4 plays different roles in stem and non-stem breast cancer cells.