Background: Crown lengthening surgery is one of the most common periodontal surgeries. The analgesic effects of benzydamine and ibuprofen tablets have been proven in various studies. The purpose of this study was to compare benzydamine hydrochloride mouthwash 0.15% with ibuprofen in decreasing the pain of patients with crown lengthening surgery who had referred to the Periodontology Department of Yazd Dentistry School in 2015. Materials & Methods: In this clinical trial study, 36 patients aged 30 to 60 years who referred to the Periodontal Department of the Dental Faculty of Yazd University of Medical Sciences needing a crown lengthening surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. The patients of the first group were asked to wash their mouth using benzydamine hydrochloride mouthwash 0.15% after the surgery according to the instructed protocol and the patients in the second group were asked to take an ibuprofen tablet (400 mg) every 6 hours. After 24 hours, the level of pain was measured by using the numerical criteria of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18. T test and Mann-Whitney test were used as appropriate. Results: 77.8% of the participants in the first group had mild pain and rest of the participants had moderate pain. 77.8% of the participants who used ibuprofen tablet reported mild pain, 16.7% had moderate pain and 5.6% had severe pain. The results did not illustrate more effect of ibuprofen on the reduction of pain after crown lengthening surgery compared with benzydamine hydrochloride 0.15% (P=0.48). Conclusion: In the present study, there were no changes in the VAS index between the two groups. Therefore, in order to decrease pain after periodontal surgery, benzydamine hydrochloride mouthwash can be widely used as it has fewer side effects, lower price, and similar effects with ibuprofen. Clinical Trial Registration Code IRCT2016012312847N2.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Hyperglycemia in diabetic patients can affect the success of many dental treatments. Thus, many dental procedures are contraindicated in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) due to the consequent delay in wound healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of a long-term control of blood sugar on tissue healing after implant placement. Methods: This cohort study evaluated 20 patients aged 50-60, referring to the School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for implant placement. All patients underwent blood sugar test and were divided into two groups of diabetic and non-diabetic patients regarding their HbA1c level. Bone loss, bleeding on probing (BOP), and pocket probing depth (PPD) of patients were measured 1 and 6 months after the implant placement. Data were analyzed using independent t test and chi-square test. Results: Blood sugar control had no significant effect on bone loss, BOP and PPD one and six month(s) after implant placement (P>0.05). Although PPD significantly increased in both groups over time (P=0.016 in the healthy group and P=0.007 in the diabetic group), the difference between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: According to the results from this study, blood sugar control examined in the age range of our study had no significant effect on tissue healing one and six month(s) after the implant placement. However, further studies are required to explore this subject more thoroughly.