Scheduling system of low earth orbit (LEO) satellite operations is one of the important tasks performed in satellites. Satellite specific constraints, satellite priorities, priorities of certain payload and special operations, as well as visibility conflicts are taken into consideration while generating the operations schedules in an optimum way. This paper proposes a tabu search heuristic for earth observation satellite scheduling problem, where as earth observing operations have to be scheduled on several resources while respecting time constraint and taking the priorities of the operations into account with the objective of scheduling as many operations as possible within its time window. The computational results indicate that this approach is typically effective to generate a near optimal and feasible schedule for imaging operations of the satellite.
Modern machining processes such as abrasive waterjet (AWJ) are widely used in manufacturing industries nowadays. Optimizing the machining control parameters are essential in order to provide a better quality and economics machining. It was reported by previous researches that artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm has less computation time requirement and offered optimal solution due to its excellent global and local search capability compared to the other optimization soft computing techniques. This research employed ABC algorithm to optimize the machining control parameters that lead to a minimum surface roughness (R a ) value for AWJ machining. Five machining control parameters that are optimized using ABC algorithm include traverse speed (V), waterjet pressure (P), standoff distance (h), abrasive grit size (d) and abrasive flow rate (m). From the experimental results, the performance of ABC was much superior where the estimated minimum R a value was 28, 42, 45, 2 and 0.9 % lower compared to actual machining, regression, artificial neural network (ANN), genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing (SA) respectively.
IntroductionThe manufacturing industries nowadays face many challenges such as market competition, expensive machining cost, customer high request and complexity of the product. For manufacturers, the main objective is to produce high quality of product with less cost and time constraints. Today, modern machining processes are widely used in manufacturing industries because it has some advantages (for example in terms of cost) compared to traditional machining processes (Ridwan et al. 2012; Mokhtar and Xu 2011; Zain et al. 2012a). According to Nagendra Parashar and Mittal 2007, traditional machining processes are costly and inefficient because it is incapable to machine the materials cost-effectively because of the tools is harder than the workpiece. The alteration or new traditional machining methods are also needed because in several cases, the methods might not be operated. Roy and Mehnen (2008) suggest that new method need to be developed in order to guarantee fast, safe and cost efficient production. The modern machining process can be categorized into four types which are (i) mechanical (e.g. abrasive waterjet (AWJ), ultrasonic machining (USM)), (ii) chemical (e.g. chemical machining (CHM)), (iii) electrochemical (e.g. electrochemical machining (ECM), electrochemical grinding (ECG)) and (iv) thermoelectric (e.g. electrobeam machining (EBM), laserbeam machining (LBM)).AWJ machining was considered in this research to compute a minimum R a value. (Zain et al. 2012b) AWJ used a high powerful flow of water in order to cut the workpiece. The high pressure of water (usually more than 900 mph) enables it to cut metal, non-metal, composite and heat sensitive workpiece. The advantage of AWJ is that it never gets dry 123
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.