Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome involving microvascular dysfunction. No treatment is available yet and as the HFpEF patient group is expanding due to the aging population, more knowledge on dysfunction of the cardiac microvasculature is required. Endothelial dysfunction, impaired angiogenesis, (perivascular) fibrosis and the pruning of capillaries (rarefaction) may all contribute to microvascular dysfunction in the heart and other organs, e.g., the kidneys. The HFpEF patient group consists mainly of post-menopausal women and female sex itself is a risk factor for this syndrome. This may point toward a role of estrogen depletion after menopause in the development of HFpEF. Estrogens favor the ratio of vasodilating over vasoconstricting factors, which results in an overall lower blood pressure in women than in men. Furthermore, estrogens improve angiogenic capacity and attenuate (perivascular) fibrosis formation. Therefore, we hypothesize that the drop of estrogen levels after menopause contributes to myocardial microvascular dysfunction and renders post-menopausal women more vulnerable for heart diseases that involve the microvasculature. This review provides a detailed summary of molecular targets of estrogen, which might guide future research and treatment options.

Sex differences in coronary artery disease (CAD) are well established, with women presenting with non-obstructive CAD more often than men do. However, recent evidence has identified coronary microvascular dysfunction as the underlying cause for cardiac complaints, yet sex-specific prevalence numbers are inconclusive. This review summarises known sex-specific aspects in the pathophysiology of both macro-and microvascular dysfunction and identifies currently existing knowledge gaps. In addition, this review describes current diagnostic approaches and whether these should take underlying sex differences into account by, for example, using different techniques or cut-off values for women and men. Future research into both innovation of imaging techniques and perfusion-related sex differences is needed to fill evidence gaps and enable the implementation of the available knowledge in daily clinical practice.