Introduction In breast surgery, an autologous flap combined with implant may reduce the risk or repair the soft-tissue defects in several cases. Traditionally, the preferred flap is the myocutaneous latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. In the perforator flap era, the evolution of LD flap is the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap. The aim of this study is the comparison between LD flap and TDAP flap with implants in terms of early complications and shoulder function. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. Between January 1 2015 and January 1 2020, 27 women underwent a unilateral total breast reconstruction with LD or TDAP flap combined with an implant at our institution. 15 women were operated with LD flap and 12 with TDAP flap. The most frequent indications for intervention were results of mastectomy and radiation-induced contracture. We evaluated several data in terms of clinical and demographical characteristics, operative and perioperative factors, and follow-up variables. We assessed shoulder function through the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Results The rate of complications was significantly lower in the TDAP group compared with the LD group (16.7% vs 60.0%, p = 0.047. Table 3). Although the small sample size limited further detailed statistical analyses, we particularly noticed no cases of donor site seroma in the TDAP group, as compared with four in the LD group. Patients in the TDAP group had an ∼11-point lower mean DASH score compared with the LD group (9.8 vs 20.5). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.049). Conclusions TDAP flap seems to be a reliable technique for soft-tissue coverage in total breast reconstruction with implants. In comparison with the traditional LD flap, it could be a more favorable option in terms of less complications and better quality of life.

No abstract

Background: Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the acromioclavicular region represents a relatively uncommon but challenging event. Many muscular, fasciocutaneous, and perforator flaps have been described, including the posterior circumflex humeral artery perforator (PCHAP) flap based on the direct cutaneous perforator of the PCHA. This study aims to describe a variant of the PCHAP flap, based on a constant musculocutaneous perforator, by means of a cadaveric study and a case series. Methods: A cadaveric study was conducted using 11 upper limbs. The perforator vessels originating from the PCHA were dissected and the musculocutaneous ones were identified and measured in their length and distance from the deltoid tuberosity. Besides, we retrospectively analyzed the posterior shoulder reconstruction conducted among 2 plastic surgery department (San Gerardo Hospital, Monza and Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo) using the musculocutaneous perforators of the PCHA. Results: The cadaver dissection showed the presence of a constant musculocutaneous perforator arising from the PCHA. The mean pedicle length is 6.10 ± 1.18 cm, and the musculocutaneous perforator pierces the fascia at a mean distance of 10.4 ± 2.06 cm from the deltoid tuberosity. In all the cadaver dissected, the perforator of interest divided into 2 terminal branches, anterior and posterior, nourishing the skin paddle.In our case series, the mean age of the patients was 66.7 years, the mean size of the defect was 46 cm 2 , the mean operating time was 79.3 minutes, the mean length of hospital stay was 2.7 days, and the complication rate was 28.6%. Conclusions: According to this preliminary data, the PCHAP flap based on the musculocutaneous perforator seems to be a reliable alternative in posterior shoulder region reconstruction.