Uric acid (UA) is the final product of purine catabolism in man, and it is excreted mainly by the kidneys when renal function is not impaired. Consequently, serum (S) UA increases as a function of purine intake, and it varies inversely to uricosuria. The latter variable diminishes in response to low-sodium intakes and vice versa. Insofar as the diet is not usually controlled in studies in which the response of SUA to drugs is evaluated, most reports are to be considered cautiously. Common diuretics elevate SUA in healthy subjects, hypertensives and patients with heart failure, apparently by elevating net UA reabsorption in the nephronal proximal tubule. This drug action, which becomes noticeable shortly after the institution of treatment and remains throughout it, starts at low doses (e.g., 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide or 1.25 mg bendrofluazide once daily in subjects with uncomplicated hypertension) and increases in dose-dependent fashion. Beta-blockers tend to elevate SUA. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalapril and ramipril have been found to increase uricosuria mildly, likely by lowering the net reabsorption of UA in the proximal tubule. These three drugs and lisinopril can blunt the rise in SUA provoked by diuretics in hypertensives if used at sufficiently high doses relative to the dose of the diuretic. The angiotensin II antagonist losartan augments uricosuria mildly and thereby decreases SUA. The cardiovascular implications of the response of SUA to drugs remain speculative. Uric acid can scavenge various reactive oxygen species and thus reduce oxidative stress, which seems to contribute to the development and/or progress of various cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, atherosclerosis and heart failure. Consequently, it may be theorised that the elevations in SUA induced by diuretics might contribute to the established favourable action of these agents on cardiovascular prognosis. Conversely, diuretic-induced increases in SUA are to be considered detrimental according to an old hypothesis that maintains that SUA is a cardiovascular risk factor; this construct is largely based upon the results of selected epidemiological undertakings. The cardiovascular implications of the effects of drugs on SUA, if any, should be elucidated through purposive research.

Patients with mild-moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) often have raised levels of serum uric acid (UA). This is due, amongst other factors, to reduced UA excretion by the kidneys, which is partly explained by restriction of sodium intake and treatment with diuretics. The decline in renal function that parallels worsening cardiac function also contributes to elevated serum UA in patients with advanced CHF. However, UA production also appears to be augmented in CHF. Because UA scavenges various reactive oxygen species, diureticinduced elevations in serum UA could be beneficial in patients with CHF. This concept is supported by the superior performance of antihypertensive therapy with diuretics in preventing heart failure. The present hypothesis may be tested by examining the effects of add-on treatment with a thiazide-type diuretic on morbidity and mortality, or surrogate variables, in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction but without fluid retention.

The responses of urine and urinary solute outputs and flows to single doses of 80 mg furosemide, 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide, and 100 or 200 mg flosequinan were investigated in healthy subjects using a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. Treatment days were separated by 7 days. Volumes of urine passed between 0 and 3, 3 and 6, 6 and 9, 9 and 12, and 12 and 24 h after drug administration were determined and urinary concentrations of chloride, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, zinc, urate, urea and creatinine were measured. Venous blood was taken before and 6 and 24 h after dosing and the serum was analysed for the same solutes as urine. Excretions of urine and urinary solutes accumulated at the end of each collection period after each formulation were fitted by the UY function, whose derivative provided corresponding flows as functions of time. Instantaneous renal clearances of solutes 6 and 24 h after dosing were evaluated from the flows. This approach showed that 80 mg furosemide and 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide were equipotent 24-h natriuretics. Rapid urinary responses which then rebounded compared with the control responses were produced by 80 mg furosemide, whereas changes after 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide were smooth. Neither 100 or 200 mg flosequinan showed any important effect on urinary excretion.

No abstract