Scrotal epidermoid cysts are rare. Intratesticular epidermoid cysts are more common than extra scrotal cysts and are the most commonest benign tumors of the testicles. Midline scrotal raphe cysts are reported, but only a few have intrapelvic extensions deep into the pelvis. A nine-year-old boy presented with a painless scrotal swelling. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis confirmed the cystic nature with an extension of the swelling up to the base of the prostate. On surgical exploration, the cyst had a tapering stalk with cranial extension up to the base of the prostate. The patient underwent an excision of the cyst and made an uneventful recovery and was asymptomatic at the end of three months of surgery. The histopathology of the lesion was typical of an epidermoid cyst. Extratesticular scrotal epidermoid cysts with pelvic extension are a rarity with less than five cases reported in the literature. Our case stands to be the youngest reported case of a scrotal epidermoid cyst based on our knowledge. Scrotal epidermoid cysts are a very rare and benign entity, and upon recognition and confirmation of the extent of spread, extratesticular scrotal cysts can safely be removed. No other management may be required with no recurrences reported.

A retained foreign body (RFB) is a rare but possible complication of surgery. Among the most common retained foreign bodies are sponges, which may include lap pads and gauze pieces. Surgical never events are errors in medical care that are identifiable and preventable but have serious consequences for the patient, making it an important problem in terms of the safety and credibility of a healthcare facility. They also pose a major medicolegal threat to healthcare organizations and a diagnostic challenge for surgeons. Herein, we present the case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with signs and symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction. She revealed a history of Caesarean section 11 months prior. She had a stormy postoperative course then and had to undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy for pus aspiration three months after surgery, where no finding other than pus was reported. Upon presentation at our tertiary care center, she was examined and found to have an RFB for 11 months. She was managed surgically with successful laparoscopic removal of the gossypiboma and consequent resolution of all her symptoms. Though rare, the possibility of an RFB, especially after open surgery, should be kept in mind when diagnosing patients who present with pain, mass in the abdomen, or symptoms of an infection. Laparotomy is the mainstay of treatment for gossypiboma, but successful laparoscopic removal of the RFB provides a definite treatment with the super-added benefits of laparoscopy. Laparoscopic removal of gossypiboma has been reported in the literature and demonstrated in our tertiary care center.