Background:
Elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been linked to pre-procedural rebleeding risk and poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the relationship between blood pressure parameters including mean arterial pressure (MAP) with rebleeding both prior to and during aneurysm securement remains unclear. This study seeks to determine the association between BP parameters and rebleeding events and outcomes in patients with aSAH.
Design/Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive patients with aSAH admitted to an academic center between July 2016 and March 2021. All BP parameters, which were recorded on an hourly basis from admission, were reviewed. Per our institutional protocol, the SBP target is <140 mmHg for all unsecured aSAH patients. Rebleeding was defined as radiographic worsening of hemorrhage prior to or immediately following aneurysm securement, as seen on imaging and determined by a radiologist. Binary regression analysis was used to determine association between maximum recorded BP parameters and outcomes including rebleeding and poor functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 4-6 at 3 months post-discharge.
Results:
The cohort included 295 patients (mean age 57 years [SD 13.4], 61% female, 87% received endovascular treatments, 13% surgical clipping). Two or more consecutive SBP values >140 were seen in 41% and >160 in 15% of patients. Rebleeding prior or during securing aneurysms including intra-procedural bleeding occurred in 53 patients (18%). There was no association between either maximum recorded SBP (169.7 mmHg [36.2] vs. 166.9 [32.7], p=0.57) or MAP (121 mmHg [22.9] vs. 117.8 [22.9], p=0.42) and rebleeding. However, maximum recorded MAP was associated with poor outcome (OR 1.01 for 1 mmHg increase in MAP, 95% CI: 1.006-1.02, p=0.039).
Conclusions:
Elevated MAP peri-securement of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm can be associated with poor outcome. Multicenter prospective studies should further examine the association between MAP cut offs and outcomes to be considered in guidelines.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.