Almost the entire world, not only China, is currently experiencing the outbreak of a novel coronavirus that causes respiratory disease, severe pneumonia, and even death. The outbreak began in Wuhan, China, in December of 2019 and is currently still ongoing. This novel coronavirus is highly contagious and has resulted in a continuously increasing number of infections and deaths that have already surpassed the SARS-CoVoutbreak that occurred in China between 2002 and 2003. It is now officially a pandemic, announced by WHO on the 11th of March. Currently, the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) can be identified by virus isolation or viral nucleic acid detection; however, false negatives associated with the nucleic acid detection provide a clinical challenge and thus make the imaging examination crucial. Imaging exams have been a main clinical diagnostic criteria for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease in China. Imaging features of multiple patchy areas of ground glass opacity and consolidation predominately in the periphery of the lungs are characteristic manifestations on chest CT and extremely helpful in the early detection and diagnosis of this disease, which aids prompt diagnosis and the eventual control of this emerging global health emergency. Key Points• In December 2019, China, an outbreak of pneumonia caused by a novel, highly contagious coronavirus raised grave concerns and posed a huge threat to global public health.• Among the infected patients, characteristic findings on CT imaging include multiple, patchy, ground-glass opacity, crazypaving pattern, and consolidation shadows, mainly distributed in the peripheral and subpleural areas of both lungs, which are very helpful for the frontline clinicians.• Imaging examination has become the indispensable means not only in the early detection and diagnosis but also in monitoring the clinical course, evaluating the disease severity, and may be presented as an important warning signal preceding the negative RT-PCR test results.

Heterogeneity in systemic sclerosis/SSc confounds clinical trials. We previously identified ‘intrinsic’ gene expression subsets by analysis of SSc skin. Here we test the hypotheses that skin gene expression signatures including intrinsic subset are associated with skin score/MRSS improvement during mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. Gene expression and intrinsic subset assignment were measured in 12 SSc patients’ biopsies and ten controls at baseline, and from serial biopsies of one cyclophosphamide-treated patient, and nine MMF-treated patients. Gene expression changes during treatment were determined using paired t-tests corrected for multiple hypothesis testing. MRSS improved in four of seven MMF-treated patients classified as the inflammatory intrinsic subset. Three patients without MRSS improvement were classified as normal-like or fibroproliferative intrinsic subsets. 321 genes (FDR <5%) were differentially expressed at baseline between patients with and without MRSS improvement during treatment. Expression of 571 genes (FDR <10%) changed between pre- and post-MMF treatment biopsies for patients demonstrating MRSS improvement. Gene expression changes in skin are only seen in patients with MRSS improvement. Baseline gene expression in skin, including intrinsic subset assignment, may identify SSc patients whose MRSS will improve during MMF treatment, suggesting that gene expression in skin may allow targeted treatment in SSc.

Objective Somatic mutations in UBA1 cause a newly defined syndrome known as VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome). More than 50% of patients currently identified as having VEXAS met diagnostic criteria for relapsing polychondritis (RP), but clinical features that characterize VEXAS within a cohort of patients with RP have not been defined. We undertook this study to define the prevalence of somatic mutations in UBA1 in patients with RP and to create an algorithm to identify patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS among those with RP. Methods Exome and targeted sequencing of UBA1 was performed in a prospective observational cohort of patients with RP. Clinical and immunologic characteristics of patients with RP were compared based on the presence or absence of UBA1 mutations. The random forest method was used to derive a clinical algorithm to identify patients with UBA1 mutations. Results Seven of 92 patients with RP (7.6%) had UBA1 mutations (referred to here as VEXAS‐RP). Patients with VEXAS‐RP were all male, were on average ≥45 years of age at disease onset, and commonly had fever, ear chondritis, skin involvement, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary infiltrates. No patient with VEXAS‐RP had chondritis of the airways or costochondritis. Mortality was greater in VEXAS‐RP than in RP (23% versus 4%; P = 0.029). Elevated acute‐phase reactants and hematologic abnormalities (e.g., macrocytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome) were prevalent in VEXAS‐RP. A decision tree algorithm based on male sex, a mean corpuscular volume >100 fl, and a platelet count <200 ×103/μl differentiated VEXAS‐RP from RP with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Conclusion Mutations in UBA1 were causal for disease in a subset of patients with RP. This subset of patients was defined by disease onset in the fifth decade of life or later, male sex, ear/nose chondritis, and hematologic abnormalities. Early identification is important in VEXAS given the associated high mortality rate.

The pulmonary lymphoid system is complex and is composed of two compartments: the pulmonary lymphatics and the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT). Additional important cells that function in the pulmonary lymphoid system include dendritic cells, Langherhans cells, macrophages, and plasma cells. An appreciation of the normal lymphoid anatomy of the lung as well as its immunology is helpful in understanding the radiologic and pathologic findings of the primary pulmonary lymphoid lesions. Primary lymphoid lesions of the lung arise from the BALT and are uncommon. However, they are increasingly recognized within the growing number of posttransplant patients as well as other patients who are receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Primary lymphoid lesions encompass a wide range of benign and malignant lesions. Benign lymphoid lesions of the lung include reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, follicular bronchiolitis, lymphoid interstitial pneumonia, and nodular lymphoid hyperplasia. Malignant lymphoid lesions of the lung include low-grade B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Last, a miscellaneous group of primary lymphoid lesions includes lymphomatoid granulomatosis, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma, and intravascular lymphoma/lymphomatosis. These lesions are best evaluated with multidetector chest computed tomography. The radiologic findings of the primary lymphoid lesions are often nonspecific and are best interpreted in correlation with clinical data and pathologic findings. The purpose of this article is to review pulmonary lymphoid anatomy as well as the most common primary pulmonary lymphoid disorders.