No abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in Armenia. Over the past two decades, the country has seen a significant rise in cancer morbidity and mortality. This review aims to provide up-to-date info about the state of cancer control in Armenia and identify priority areas of research. The paper analyzes published literature and local and international statistical reports on Armenia and similar countries to put numbers into context. While cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment are improving, the prevalence of risk factors is still quite high and smoking is widespread. Early detection rates are low and several important screening programs are absent. Diagnosis and treatment methods are not standardized; there is a lack of treatment accessibility due to insufficient government coverage and limited availability of essential medicines. Overall, there is room for improvement in this sector, as research is limited and multidisciplinary approaches to the topic are rare.

We performed a literature review to examine barriers for rhabdomyosarcoma treatment in low‐resource settings, and identified 29 articles from 14 middle‐income countries, with none from low‐income countries. Notable findings included inconsistent use of local control modalities, lack of diagnostics in some settings, and high rate of abandonment specifically in low middle‐income countries. Reported limitations included lack of surgical expertise and/or radiation therapy, advanced stage of disease, and absence of health insurance. Although very poor outcomes were prevalent in several settings, good outcomes were achievable in others when multidisciplinary therapy and financial coverage of medical care were made available.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 20 (4), 991-994 Recent decades' progress in science and medicine made crucial changes in the outcomes of childhood cancer. Currently, in high-income countries, where around 20% of global pediatric cancer cases are reported, through the implementation of modern diagnostic and treatment methods, policy changes for increasing early detection, the long-term survival of pediatric cancer reaches up to 85% and more (Howard et al., 2008). However, the overall Abstract Background: One of the main contributors in low survival rate in LMIC is the lack of availability of cancer medications for curative, supportive and palliative care. In many developing countries access to cytotoxic medicine is a major challenge. The information about the availability of essential medicines for pediatric cancer in the country is not known. The main objective of this study was to determine whether the medications used during the treatment of pediatric cancer are available in Armenia. Methods: In summer 2016 we conducted a survey in the 3 main pharmacies in Yerevan, which import pediatric cancer medications to Armenia to evaluate whether medications used during cancer treatment are officially registered and available in the country. In addition, the information on official registration was cross-checked with the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia (MOH). Simultaneously, detailed information about the drugs, on type of produced drug company, doses and price intervals was confined from the price lists of the national drug importer companies. Results: The survey included 64 agents in three classes of medication: anti-neoplastics, anti-microbials, and drugs used in supportive care. All of these medications were included in the recent version of the WHO model list of essential medicines. From 30 anti-neoplastic medications on the essential medicines list 22 (73%) were officially registered in Armenia; from 19 anti-microbial drugs all were registered except caspofungin and from 15 supportive care agents 13 (87%) were registered. From registered anti-neoplastic drugs 18% and from antimicrobial drugs 33% were not available in the drug stores. Conclusion: This study showed that not all the drugs from the SIOP PODC Essential Medication list for pediatric oncology are officially registered and available in Armenia, and effective drug regulation focusing on the childhood cancer care medicine is needed for improving the situation in the country.

PURPOSE In Armenia, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers. It is in the third place by incidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment and outcomes of CRC in Armenia during the last 9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this retrospective hospital-based study, we have collected data from two main oncology centers in Armenia: National Oncology Center and “Muratsan” Hospital of Yerevan State Medical University. The information about patients with CRC who were treated at these two centers between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018 was collected from the medical records. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 602 patients with CRC were involved in the final analysis. Median follow-up time was 37 months (range, 3-207 months). A total of 8.6% of patients had stage I, 32.9% stage II, 38.0% stage III, and 17.6% stage IV cancer; for 2.7% patients, the stage was unknown. The main independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were tumor stage, grade, and histology. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in stage II colon cancer and stage III rectal but not in stage II rectal cancer. Radiotherapy did not yield survival improvement in stage II or III rectal cancer. Three- and 5-year OS rates were 62.9% and 51.8% for all stages combined and 79.7% and 68.5% for stages I-II, 62.5% and 48.4% for stage III, and 24.4% and 17% for stage IV respectively. CONCLUSION As seen from our results, our survival rates are lower than those of the developed world. Additional research is needed to identify the underlying reasons and to improve patients’ treatment and outcomes in Armenia.