Male patients are routinely consulted regarding dislike of their chest appearance. To date, majority of patients have desired elimination of their feminine-appearing breast, termed gynecomastia. These patients have associated their overweight body image, with the femininity of their breasts as presented by fullness and roundedness of their breasts and subsequently have desired maximal flattening of their breast. We present a new set of patients who desire a more muscular-appearing chest than a gynecomastia repair that is interposed on a chiseled abdominal contour. In contrast to the former set of patients, these patients desire bulking of their breasts with a bolder-appearing armor plate look. We present an alternative to traditional gynecomastia repair which involves a novel approach to chest contouring creating a flat, yet bold, pentagonal-shaped breast with linear borders utilizing both fat and gland removal as well as strategic fat grafting back into the chest. We present a novel protocol to create an armor plate male chest appearance as an alternative to traditional gynecomastia contouring. All patients treated to date demonstrate a muscular-appearing chest that is harmonious on an interposed masculine-appearing abdomen.
Background Patients are routinely consulted regarding dislike of their upper and middle back contour and associated back rolls that stick out of their bras. Although patients only associate this fullness with excess fat, on examination it becomes evident that back rolls are due to a combination of excess fat as well as skin redundancy. To date, treatment of both excess skin and fat in back rolls has required consideration of excisional surgery such as an upper body lift. Objectives We present 14 consecutive back contouring cases that were treated with an alternative protocol involving simultaneous ultrasound assisted liposuction and helium activated radiofrequency. Methods Patients underwent ultrasound assisted liposuction to remove superficial fat over the upper and middle back as well as helium activated radiofrequency to tighten the skin using subdermal coagulation. Results All 14 patients visually demonstrated elimination of back rolls and improvement in upper and middle back contour. All 14 patients also reported overall satisfaction in their postoperative follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12-months. Conclusion In summary, simultaneous ultrasound assisted liposuction and helium activated radiofrequency provide an effective treatment for patients desiring improvements in upper and middle back contour and elimination of back rolls while avoiding more invasive excisional surgeries. Level of Evidence: 4
lthough aesthetic gluteoplasty and/or Brazilian butt lift procedures have become popularized, the ideal female buttock size and shape have not been objectified. Because a high number of Brazilian butt lift operations are performed today, variability in both buttock size and shape has been observed. Moreover, from our personal clinical experience, an increasing number of Brazilian butt lift revision operations are being requested and performed. The high number of Brazilian butt lift revisions suggests that patients are not satisfied with their outcomes. Although botched Brazilian butt lifts can follow poorly performed surgical techniques that result in poor graft take, a large number of patients just do not like the buttock size and shape created. This is because of a disconnect between patient preferences and their provider's aesthetic eye. This observation results from inability to communicate and as a result fulfill the individual patient's unique buttock goals.Previous authors have implied that the perception of beauty is influenced by ethnic, cultural, and other demographic factors. 1 In addition, we have observed that perception of beauty in the buttock, specifically, is clearly variable with respect to shape
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.