New agricultural practices and land-use intensification in the Cerrado biome have affected the soil carbon stocks. A major part of the native vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrado, a tropical savanna-like ecoregion, has been replaced by crops, which has caused changes in the soil carbon (C) stocks. To ensure the sustainability of this intensified agricultural production, actions have been taken to increase soil C stocks and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. In the last two decades, new agricultural practices have been adopted in the Cerrado region, and their impact on C stocks needs to be better understood. This subject has been addressed in a systematic review of the existing data in the literature, consisting of 63 articles from the Scopus database. Our review showed that the replacement of Cerrado vegetation by crop species decreased the original soil C stocks (depth 0–30 cm) by 73%, with a peak loss of 61.14 Mg ha−1. However, when analyzing the 0–100 cm layer, 52.4% of the C stock data were higher under cultivated areas than in native Cerrado soils, with a peak gain of 93.6 Mg ha−1. The agricultural practices implemented in the Brazilian Cerrado make low-carbon agriculture in this biome possible.
Forest soils are N 2 O sources and commonly act as CH 4 sinks. This study evaluated the dynamics of the CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes of soils under Eucalyptus plantations and native Cerrado vegetation, as well as possible interactions between environmental factors and fluxes. The study was carried out in the Distrito Federal, Brazil, during 26 months, in three areas: in two stands of the hybrid Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis, planted in 2011 (E1), and in 2009 (E2) and native Cerrado vegetation (CE). Measurements to determine the fluxes in a closed static chamber were carried out from Oct 2013 to Nov 2015. Soil and climate factors were monitored. During the study period, the mean CH 4 fluxes were-22.48,-8.38 and-1.31 μg CH 4 m-2 h-1 and the mean N 2 O fluxes 5.45, 4.85 and 3.85 μg N 2 O m-2 h-1 from E1, E2 and CE, respectively. Seasonality affected plantations in the studied sites. Cumulative CH 4 influxes were calculated (year-1:-1.86 to-0.63 kg ha-1 yr-1 ; year-2:-1.85 to-1.34 kg ha-1 yr-1). Cumulative N 2 O fluxes in the three sites were ≤ 0.85 kg ha-1 yr-1. The change in land use from Cerrado to Eucalyptus plantations did not significantly changed regarding greenhouse gases (GHG), compared to the native vegetation. Flux rates of both gases (N 2 O and CH 4) were low. Temporal variations in GHG fluxes and different ages of the stands did not cause significant differences in cumulative annual fluxes.
The objective of this work was to evaluate soil carbon fractions under cover crops cultivated after corn (Zea mays), with or without nitrogen topdressing fertilization, in a long-term experiment in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design, in split-plots with three replicates. The plots were represented by the cover crops, and the subplots, by the presence or absence of N topdressing for corn. The following cover crop species were planted after the harvest of the 30F53VYHR corn hybrid: 'BRS Mandarin' pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea), oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus), and black mucuna (Mucuna aterrima). After the cutting of the cover crops, soil samples were collected at 0.0‒0.10 and 0.10‒0.20 m soil depths. After corn harvest, samples of its residues were taken. The cover crops alter the soil chemical and physical fractions, especially fulvic acid and soil particulate organic carbon. Nitrogen topdressing for corn decreases fulvic acid, but increases the humic acid/fulvic acid ratio and particulate organic carbon in the deeper soil layer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.