No abstract

This acute hemodynamic study demonstrated that biventricular DDD pacing may significantly improve cardiac performance in patients with IVCB and with severe heart failure, in comparison with intrinsic conduction and single-site RV DDD pacing.

Our objective was to improve hemodynamics by synchronous right and left site ventricular pacing in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Previous studies reported a benefit of dual chamber pacing with a short AV delay in patients with severe CHF. Other works, however, show contradictory results. Deleterious effects due to a desynchronization of right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) contractions have been suggested. This study included eight subjects with widened QRS and end-stage heart failure despite maximal medical therapy, who refused, or were not eligible to undergo heart transplantation, Each patient underwent a baseline, invasive hemodynamic evaluation with insertion of three temporary leads to allow different pacing configurations, including RV apex and outflow tract pacing, and biventricular pacing between the RV outflow tract and LV and RV apex and LV. According to the results of this baseline study, the configuration of preexistent pacemakers was modified or new systems were implanted to allow biventricular pacing, which, in patients with sinus rhythm, was atrial triggered. Biventricular pacing increased the mean cardiac index (CI) by 25% (from a baseline of 1.83 +/- 0.30 L/min per m2, P < 0.006), decreased the mean V wave by 26% (from a baseline of 36 +/- 12 mmHg, P < 0.004), and decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by 17% (from a baseline of 31 +/- 10 mmHg, P < 0.01). Four patients died (1 preoperatively, 1 intraoperatively, 2 within 3 months, and 1 of a noncardiac cause). The four surviving patients have clinically improved from New York Heart Association Functional Class IV to Class II. In these survivors, CI decreased by 15% (P < 0.007) when multisite pacing was turned off during follow-up. In patients with end-stage heart failure, multisite pacing may be associated with a rapid and sustained hemodynamic improvement.

This paper describes a preliminary experiment-conducted jointly by 2 centers-of permanent left ventricular pacing using leads inserted by the transvenous route and through the coronary sinus into the cardiac veins of the left ventricle free wall. The aim was to obtain permanent biventricular pacing in a totally endocavitary configuration in patients with severe LV dysfunction and drug-refractory heart failure. Two types of leads were used: nonspecific unipolar leads at the beginning of the experiment, followed by leads specifically designed to be used in the coronary sinus in a second step. The electrode could be fitted in an adequate location in 35 of the 47 patients (75.4%), with a 1.15 +/- 0.7 V acute pacing threshold and 11.8 +/- 5.7 mV R wave amplitude. The success rate was significantly higher with the specific electrodes (81.8% vs 53.3%, p < 0.001). The pacing and sensing thresholds upon implantation were not influenced by the type of lead or by the localization of the cardiac vein that was catheterized (great cardiac vein, lateral vein, postero-lateral or posterior vein, mid cardiac vein). In contrast, the pacing threshold was significantly lower (0.8 +/- 0.2 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 V; p = 0.002) and the R wave amplitude tended to be greater (13.1 +/- 4.5 mV vs 9.3 +/- 6.5 mV; p = 0.07) when the tip electrode could be inserted distally into the vein, by comparison with a proximal site near the ostium. At the end of follow-up (10.2 +/- 8.7 months), 34 out of the 35 leads were still fully functional, with a chronic pacing threshold of 1.8 +/- 0.7 V and a R wave amplitude of 10.7 +/- 6 mV. To conclude, permanent LV pacing via the transvenous route is possible in most patients, with excellent safety and long-term results.

Multisite biventricular pacing therapy offers significant clinical improvement in some stimulated patients with electrocardiographic criteria of cardiac dyssynchrony. However, observational data increasingly suggest that patients suffering from congestive heart failure in presence of modest QRS widening may also derive benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and that some patients can be significantly improved clinically after system implantation despite no apparent change in QRS width. This pilot study explored the value of an echocardiographic model to identify cardiac electromechanical dyssynchrony parameters (EDP) in candidates for CRT, and their potential correction after implantation. The study included 66 consecutive CRT recipients of CRT in NYHA functional class III or IV who had one or more atrioventricular, interventricular or intraventricular dyssynchrony criteria. An immediate improvement was observed in 85% of the population with a partial or total correction of their EDP. However, the modifications in EDP differed considerably between recipients of de novo CRT systems and patients with previously implanted standard pacing systems upgraded with the implantation of a left ventricular lead. EDP measurements appear to identify potential candidates for CRT, and to confirm the success of system implantation.