A theoretical study of ethene trimerization at a cationic (C6H5CH2C5H4)Ti fragment generally supports the metallacycle mechanism proposed earlier for this reaction. However, the crucial formation of the 1-hexene complex from a titanacycloheptane intermediate occurs by direct Cβ → Cα ‘ hydrogen transfer rather than by the more traditional β-elimination/reductive elimination sequence. The pendant arene moiety “breathes” during the reaction, being more strongly bound at the TiII stage than at the TiIV stage of the reaction. Its main role is to make the olefin complex formation more endothermic, thus increasing the barriers for formation of titanacyclopentane and titanacycloheptane intermediates. For the “naked” (C5H5)Ti system, which lacks this effect, further ring growth wins over hexene formation. But even for the bridged (C6H5CH2C5H4)Ti system, we find that the various reactions are very delicately balanced.

One-electron oxidation of [(Me(n)tpa)Ir(I)(ethene)]+ complexes (Me(3)tpa = N,N,N-tri(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)amine; Me(2)tpa = N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-N,N,-di[(6-methyl-2-pyridyl)methyl]-amine) results in relatively stable, five-coordinate Ir(II)-olefin species [(Me(n)tpa)Ir(II)(ethene)](2+) (1(2+): n = 3; 2(2+): n = 2). These contain a "vacant site" at iridium and a "non-innocent" ethene fragment, allowing radical type addition reactions at both the metal and the ethene ligand. The balance between metal- and ligand-centered radical behavior is influenced by the donor capacity of the solvent. In weakly coordinating solvents, 1(2+) and 2(2+) behave as moderately reactive metallo-radicals. Radical coupling of 1(2+) with NO in acetone occurs at the metal, resulting in dissociation of ethene and formation of the stable nitrosyl complex [(Me(3)tpa)Ir(NO)](2+) (6(2+)). In the coordinating solvent MeCN, 1(2+) generates more reactive radicals; [(Me(3)tpa)Ir(MeCN)(ethene)](2+) (9(2+)) by MeCN coordination, and [(Me(3)tpa)Ir(II)(MeCN)](2+) (10(2+)) by substitution of MeCN for ethene. Complex 10(2+) is a metallo-radical, like 1(2+) but more reactive. DFT calculations indicate that 9(2+) is intermediate between the slipped-olefin Ir(II)(CH(2)=CH(2)) and ethyl radical Ir(III)-CH(2)-CH(2). resonance structures, of which the latter prevails. The ethyl radical character of 9(2+) allows radical type addition reactions at the ethene ligand. Complex 2(2+) behaves similarly in MeCN. In the absence of further reagents, 1(2+) and 2(2+) convert to the ethylene bridged species [(Me(n)tpa)(MeCN)Ir(III)(mu(2)-C(2)H(4))Ir(III)(MeCN)(Me(3)tpa)](4+) (n = 3: 3(4+); n = 2: 4(4+)) in MeCN. In the presence of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxo), formation of 3(4+) from 1(2+) in MeCN is completely suppressed and only [(Me(3)tpa)Ir(III)(TEMPO(-))(MeCN)](2+) (7(2+)) is formed. This is thought to proceed via radical coupling of TEMPO at the metal center of 10(2+). In the presence of water, hydrolysis of the coordinated acetonitrile fragment of 7(2+) results in the acetamido complex [(Me(3)tpa)Ir(III)(NHC(O)CH(3)))(TEMPOH)](2+) (8(2+)).

Oxidation induces oxygenation: The first IrII–ethene complex ever (2) was obtained by one‐electron oxidation of the corresponding IrI–ethene complex 1. Whereas 1 reacts with dioxygen to give an IrIII–peroxo‐ethene complex, the IrII–ethene complex 2 activates dioxygen towards CO bond formation and gives the IrIII–formylmethyl complex 3.

In this paper we present a systematic comparison of the performance of different computational approaches to study the propagation and termination reactions of olefins with a prototype homogeneous group 4 ansa-metallocene catalyst. Chain propagation, β-H transfer to the monomer, and β-H elimination to the metal have been investigated for the H 2 Si-(Cp) 2 ZrR + (R ) ethyl, n-butyl) + C 2 H 4 system using ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) techniques. For all the species investigated, all the computational approaches we considered result in substantially similar geometries. A comparison of the DFT and Møller-Plesset theory (MP2) propagation and termination barriers with extrapolated coupled-cluster calculations with inclusion of single, double, and perturbatively connected triple excitation (CCSD(T)) values indicates that all the pure functionals considered underestimate the difference between termination and propagation by roughly 3-4 kcal/mol. In contrast, hybrid functionals are within 1 kcal/mol from extrapolated CCSD(T) values. For a comparison with experimental results inclusion of zero-point energy contributions and the use of an alkyl group longer than ethyl to simulate the growing chain in both termination reactions are mandatory.

A DFT study of the oxidation of (tpa)M I (C 2 H 4 ) + and (dpa-R)M I (cod) + complexes (M = Rh, Ir) by H 2 O 2 indicates that the reaction starts with heterolytic cleavage of the peroxide O−O bond, leading to M III (olefin)(OH) 2+ species. These can then undergo cyclisation, followed by deprotonation to oxetanes. In the oxidation of COD complexes, further cyclisation to in-