Objectives: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to review diagnostic testing confirming diagnosis of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, identify initial conservative treatment measures, and discuss pharmacologic and endoscopic options for decompression.Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a syndrome of massive distension of colon without mechanical obstruction. Ischemia and perforation remain the endpoint of progressive untreated distension and early recognition and timely intervention is of utmost importance. The diagnosis of ACPO depends on excluding mechanical bowel obstruction and its subsequent management has evolved with improved understanding of its pathophysiology and pharmacologic and endoscopic treatment options. Historical BackgroundACPO is also known by the eponym Ogilvie syndrome. Sir William Heneage Ogilvie described two patients diagnosed with colonic pseudo-obstruction in 1948.1 Both patients had Keywords► acute colonic pseudoobstruction ► ogilvie syndrome AbstractAlthough acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), also known as Ogilvie syndrome, is a well-known clinical entity, in many respects it remains poorly understood and continues to challenge physicians and surgeons alike. Our understanding of ACPO continues to evolve and its epidemiology has changed as new conditions have been identified predisposing to ACPO with critical illness providing the common thread among them. A physician must keep ACPO high in the list of differential diagnoses when dealing with the patient experiencing abdominal distention, and one must be prepared to employ and interpret imaging studies to exclude mechanical obstruction. Rapid diagnosis is the key, and institution of conservative measures often will lead to resolution. Fortunately, when this fails pharmacologic intervention with neostigmine often proves effective. However, it is not a panacea: consensus on dosing does not exist, administration techniques vary and may impact efficacy, contraindications limit its use, and persistence and or recurrence of ACPO mandate continued search for additional medical therapies. When medical therapy fails or is contraindicated, endoscopy offers effective intervention with advanced techniques such as decompression tubes or percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy providing effective results. Operative intervention remains the treatment of last resort; surgical outcomes are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a surgeon should be aware of all options for decompression-conservative, pharmacologic, and endoscopic-and use them in best combination to the advantage of patients who often suffer from significant concurrent illnesses making them poor operative candidates.

PCs had similar outcomes to CTs in terms of failure rate and tube insertion-related complications, and the initial drainage output from PCs was not inferior to that of CTs. The usage of PCs was, however, selective. A future multi-center study is needed to provide additional support and information for PC usage in traumatic HTX/HPTX.

Replacement of hypotension and tachycardia with a SI > 1.0 and inclusion of pelvic fracture enhanced discrimination of ABC score for predicting the need for MT. The current ABC score would benefit from revision to more appropriately identify patients requiring MT.

Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie's syndrome) is an adynamic ileus without mechanical obstruction of the bowel. Predisposing factors include: abdominal and pelvic surgery, or trauma, or severe pre-existing systemic illness. In obstetrics, many cases have been reported after caesarean delivery, but none following a vaginal delivery. Conservative and pharmacological therapies are effective in many patients, but surgical intervention may be required. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment is imperative to avoid caecal rupture, faecal peritonitis and the associated high maternal mortality. High index of clinical suspicion and proper assessment of the gastrointestinal system in the post-surgical patient are vital to the management of this uncommon but potentially serious condition met with in obstetrics practice.

Prognostic studies, level III.