Ahstnict. Estimation of invertebrate biomass is a critical step in addressing many ecological questions in aquatic environments. Length-dry mass regressions are the most widely used approach for estimating benthic invertebrate biomass because they are faster and more precise than other methods. A compilation and analysis of length-mass regressions using the power model, M (mass) = n L (length)h, are presented from 30 y of data collected by the authors, primarily from the southeastern USA, along with published regressions from the rest of North America. A total of 442 new and published regressions are presented, mostly for genus or species, based on total body length or other linear measurements. The regressions include 64 families of aquatic insects and 12 families of other invertebrate groups (mostly molluscs and crustaceans). Regressions were obtained for 134 insect genera (155 species) and 153 total invertebrate genera (184 species). Regressions are provided for both body length and head width for some taxa. In some cases, regressions are provided from multiple localities for single taxa. When using body length in the equations, there were no significant differences in the mean value of the exponent b among 8 insect orders or Amphipoda. The mean value of b for insects was 2.79, ranging from only 2.69 to 2.91 among orders. The mean value of b for Decapoda (3.63), however, was significantly higher than all insects orders and amphipods. Mean values of n were not significantly different among the 8 insect orders and Amphipoda, reflecting considerable variability within orders. Reasons for potential differences in b among taxa are explained with hypothetical examples showing how b responds to changes in linear dimensions and specific gravity. When using head width as the linear dimension in the power model, the mean value of b was higher (3.11) than for body length and more variable among orders (2.8-3.3). Values of b for Ephemeroptera (3.3) were significantly higher than those for Odonata, Megaloptera, and Diptera. For those equations in which ash-free dry mass was used, % ash varied considerably among functional feeding groups (3.3-12.4%). Percent ash varied from 4.Oo/o to 8.5% among major insect orders, but was 18.9% for snails (without shells). Family-level regressions also are presented so that they can be used when generic equations are unavailable or when organisms are only identified to the family level. It is our intention that these regressions be used by others in estimating mass from linear dimensions, but potential errors must be recognized.
Life histories and annual production were determined for six species of net—spinning caddisflies in a headwater stream of the Tallulah River in north Georgia, USA. Five species in the family Hydropsychidae were univoltine, whereas the sixth, a member of the Philopotamidae, had at least two generations per year. Combined annual production, as determined by the Hynes method, was 1.0 g/m2 (ash—free dry mass). Seventy—five percent of the production was concentrated in the two largest species, Arctopsyche irrorata and Parapsyche cardis. The remaining production from highest to lowest percent, was contributed by Dolophilodes distinctus, Hydropsyche sparna, Diplectrona modesta, and Hydropsyche macleodi. Analysis of gut contents alone indicated that detritus was the most important food source. However, food preference and food—specific ecological efficiencies were utilized to calculate the amount of production attributable to each major food category. Surprisingly, almost 80% of all caddisfly production was attributed to animal food, 13% to detritus, and 8% to algae. Actual annual consumption required to account for this production was 2.28 g/m2 animals, 2.54 g/m2 detritus, and 0.51 g/m2 algae. We attempt to quantify the role that net—spinning caddisflies play in the @`spiralling" of seston in mountain streams. Our results show that the omnivorous caddisflies are not the major consumer of detritus and algae, and that they produce more detritus in their feces than they consume, thus appearing to lower the food quality of the seston. Net—spinning caddisfly production in this mountain stream appears to be limited by the amount of high quality food available in the seston.
The accepted procedure for de termining production of multivoltine invertebrates by use of the Hynes method is to multiply the Hynes value by the number of generations per year. For aquatic insects, if pupal, adult, or egg stages comprise a significant portion of total generation time, this procedure will underestimate production. For crustaceans, if reproduction occurs before attaining the final size class, the procedure, using generation time, will overestimate production. It is necessary to multiply the Hynes value by 365/CPI, where CPI is the cohort production interval (in days) from hatching to the attainment of the largest aquatic size class.
Habitat and life history are critical elements in assessing the production dynamics of invertebrates and their role in aquatic ecosystems. We studied invertebrate productivity at two sites in a subtropical blackwater river (the Satilla) in the Lower Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA, and found that submerged wooden substrates, or snags, are heavily colonized by aquatic insects. We compared invertebrate productivity on the snag habitat with productivity in the sandy benthic habitat of the main channel, and the muddy benthic habitat of the backwaters. The size—frequency method was applied to individual taxa in order to determine total invertebrate productivity. Emphasis was placed on the importance of the length of larval life, or the cohort production interval, in determining biomass turnover rates. The diversity of taxa was much higher on the snag habitat than in either of the benthic habitats. Filter—feeding caddisflies (especially Hydropsyche spp.) and black flies (Simulium spp.) were the major consumers on the snag habitat. Several species of midges, mayflies, and beetles also were abundant. Total densities, standing stock biomass, and production were very high for primary consumers on snags. Annual production was 51.9 and 67.1 g°m—2°yr—1 (dry mass per surface area of snag, or effective habitat) for the two sites. Hellgrammites, dragonflies, and stoneflies were the major insect predators colonizing snags, and their production was 5.5 and 5.2 g@mm—2°yr—1 (effective habitat). Annual production/biomass ratios (P/B) were usually 5—10 for insects that had univoltine or bivoltine life cycles. Annual P/B estimates were very high for midges (>100) and black flies (>70), since length of larval life was estimated to be very short. The sandy—substrate benthos consisted almost exclusively of very small midges with oligochaetes of lesser abundance. Densities were quite high (>20 000/m2), but biomass was very low (° 100 mg/m2 or less). Production of primary consumers was >11 g°m—2°yr—1 with a very high estimate of annual P/B (166—227). The major predators were Ceratopogonidae (biting midges) larvae with an annual production of 1.6—2.6 g°m—2°yr—1. The muddy—substrate benthos consisted primarily of oligochaetes (Limnodrilus) and midges. Annual production was °7—10 g°m—2°yr—1 for primary consumers. The major predators were larger Tanypodinae midges. On a substrate surface area basis, standing stock biomass on snags was 20—50 times higher than in the sandy habitat and 5—10 times higher than in the muddy habitat. Production on snags was only 3—4 times higher than production in the benthic habitats, with higher annual P/B in the latter. The production estimates for the snag habitat are among the highest yet reported for lotic ecosystems, and it appears that production on snags is limited by available substrate. Habitat areas per length of shoreline were estimated so that we could approximate relative amounts of biomass and production for a stretch of river. Although the snag habitat accounted for only °6% of the effective habitat subs...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.