The Doppler guide wire measures phasic flow velocity patterns and linearly tracks changes in flow rate in small, straight coronary arteries. It should facilitate measurement of phasic coronary flow velocity during coronary angiography and angioplasty.

We examined the ability of individual regions of the canine left ventricle to increase blood flow relative to baseline rates of perfusion. Regional coronary flow was measured by injecting radioactive microspheres over 90 seconds in seven anesthetized mongrel dogs. Preliminary experiments demonstrated a correlation between the regional distributions of blood flow during asphyxia and pharmacological vasodilatation with adenosine (mean r = 0.75; 192 regions in each of two dogs), both of which resulted in increased coronary flow. Subsequent experiments, during which coronary perfusion pressure was held constant at 80 mm Hg, examined the pattern of blood flow in 384 regions (mean weight, 106 mg) of the left ventricular free wall during resting flow and during maximal coronary flow effected by intracoronary adenosine infusion. We found that resting and maximal flow patterns were completely uncorrelated to each other in a given dog (mean r = 0.06, p = NS; n = 3 dogs). Furthermore, regional coronary reserve, defined as the ratio of maximal to resting flow, ranged from 1.75 (i.e., resting flow was 57% of maximum) to 21.9 (resting flow was 4.5% of maximum). Thus, coronary reserve is spatially heterogeneous and determined by two distinct perfusion patterns: the resting (control) pattern and the maximal perfusion pattern. Normal hearts, therefore, contain small regions that may be relatively more vulnerable to ischemia. This may explain the patchy nature of infarction with hypoxia and at reduced perfusion pressures as well as the difficulty of using global parameters to predict regional ischemia. Despite the wide dispersion of coronary reserve, we found, by autocorrelation analysis, that reserve in neighboring regions (even when separated by a distance of several tissue samples) was significantly correlated. This also applied to patterns of resting myocardial flow. Thus, both resting coronary blood flow and reserve appear to be locally continuous and may define functional zones of vascular control and vulnerability, respectively.

To examine the influence of cardiac contraction on systolic coronary flow and transmural blood flow distribution, we measured phasic blood flow velocity in distal extramural coronary arteries by Doppler velocimeter and regional myocardial blood flow by radiolabeled microspheres while the heart was beating and during prolonged diastoles in 12 dogs. A servo-controlled coronary perfusion circuit allowed mean coronary pressure to be selected and maintained during beating and diastolic conditions. In epicardial arteries just proximal to their entrance into the myocardium, blood flow was either negligible or reverse in direction during systole. When the heart was beating, subepicardial blood flow was 24.2 +/- 12.3% higher than during asystole (5.05 +/- 0.91 and 4.11 +/- 0.79 ml.min-1.g-1 for beating and prolonged diastoles, respectively; P less than 0.01). In the subendocardium, flow was 49.8 +/- 14.7% lower in the beating condition than during prolonged diastoles (4.23 +/- 1.46 and 8.26 +/- 1.71 ml.min-1.g-1 for beating and asystole, respectively; P less than 0.01). When heart rate was increased stepwise from 60 to 150 beats/min, subendocardial flow fell approximately linearly; flow to the superficial layer was relatively unaffected. In beating hearts, lowering mean left main coronary artery (LMCA) pressure from 80 to 50 mmHg resulted in more systolic reverse flow and a fall in inner-to-outer flow ratio from 0.82 +/- 0.18 to 0.66 +/- 0.34 (P less than 0.05). Because mean LMCA pressure was held constant when the heart was stopped, differences in regional blood flow between beating and diastolic conditions were primarily due to cardiac contraction. Because little or no blood entered the myocardium from the extramural arteries during systole, we conclude that the decrease in subendocardial flow and the increase in subepicardial flow were caused by retrograde pumping of blood from the deep layer to the superficial layer of the left ventricle. Systolic retrograde flow to the subepicardium may help explain this layer's relative protection from ischemia.

No abstract

To evaluate the roles of intramyocardial forces and systolic ventricular pressure in myocardial flow in the different layers separately, we measured myocardial flow in rabbit hearts during stable systolic contracture with left ventricular pressures of 60 (n = 5) and 0 mmHg (n = 5) and during stable diastolic arrest (n = 5). We also measured the number and size of the intramyocardial vessels after perfusion fixation (systolic arrest, n = 5; diastolic arrest, n = 5). In 25 rabbits, hearts were excised and perfused from the aortic root. Systolic arrest was achieved by perfusion of a low-Ca2+ Tyrode solution containing 2.0 mM Ba2+. Diastolic arrest was achieved by intraventricular injection of 700-1,000 mg pentobarbital sodium and was maintained by perfusion with St. Thomas cardioplegic solution. At perfusion pressure of 100 mmHg, subendocardial flow was lower than subepicardial flow during systolic arrest regardless of left ventricular pressure, whereas during diastolic arrest, subendocardial flow was higher than subepicardial flow. Subendocardial-to-subepicardial flow ratios for a physiological range of perfusion pressures were lower during systolic arrest with low rather than with high left ventricular pressure. Small arteriolar and capillary densities showed no difference between subendocardium and subepicardium. During systolic arrest, diameters of subendocardial terminal arterioles (4.6 +/- 1.3 microns) and capillaries (4.0 +/- 1.3 microns) were smaller than those in the subepicardium (8.8 +/- 1.7 and 7.1 +/- 1.6 microns, respectively; P less than 0.0001), whereas during diastolic arrest, diameters of subendocardial terminal arterioles (10.1 +/- 2.0 microns) and capillaries (7.6 +/- 1.8 microns) were slightly larger than those in the subepicardium (9.5 +/- 1.5 and 6.7 +/- 1.0 microns, respectively; P less than 0.01). We conclude that cardiac contraction predominantly affects subendocardial vessels and impedes subendocardial flow more than subepicardial flow regardless of left ventricular pressure.