Adaptation to hypoxia lessens myocardial ischemic injury. This study tested whether hypoxia-induced beta-adrenergic activity mobilizes mechanisms that protect myocardium during subsequent ischemia and reperfusion. Dogs were intermittent hypoxia conditioned (IHC) by a 20 days program of 5-8 daily, 5-10 min cycles of normobaric hypoxia (FIO2 = 9.5-10%), or sham conditioned with normoxic air, and metoprolol (beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist) was administered throughout the IHC program. Twenty-four hours after the last IHC session, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was occluded for 60 min, and then reperfused for 5 h. Area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS) were measured. IHC lowered IS/AAR from 38+/-6% in sham-conditioned dogs to 1.1+/-0.3%, and eliminated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) that occurred in 14 of 17 non-conditioned dogs. Metoprolol blunted IHC-evoked cardioprotection (IS/AAR=27+/-3%), and VT and/or VF occurred in 5 of 6 dogs. Metoprolol did not exacerbate ischemic injury in sham-conditioned dogs (IS/AAR=38+/-2%). Neither IHC nor metoprolol affected hematocrit or LAD collateral blood flow. A single IHC session failed to protect ischemic myocardium (IS/AAR = 36+/-8%), and protection was incomplete after 10 days of IHC (IS/AAR = 13+/-5%), suggesting that de novo protein synthesis was required for protection. Thus, episodic beta1-adrenergic activation during IHC evokes progressive development of powerful resistance to myocardial ischemia.
LPT significantly increased both thoracic duct lymph flow and leukocyte count, so lymph leukocyte flux was markedly enhanced. Increased mobilization of immune cells is likely and important mechanism responsible for the enhanced immunity and recovery from infection of patients treated with LPT.
LPT mobilizes leukocytes from GALT, and these leukocytes are transported by the lymphatic circulation. This enhanced release of leukocytes from GALT may provide scientific rationale for the clinical use of LPT to improve immune function.
Oxidative stress during cardiac arrest may inactivate myocardial enzymes and thereby exacerbate ischemic derangements of myocardial metabolism. This study examined the impact of cardiac arrest on left ventricular enzymes. Beagles were subjected to 5 min of cardiac arrest and 5 min of open-chest cardiac compressions (OCCC) before epicardial direct current countershocks were applied to restore sinus rhythm. Glutathione/glutathione disulfide redox state (GSH/GSSG) and a panel of enzyme activities were measured in snap-frozen left ventricle. To test whether oxidative stress during arrest inactivated the enzymes, metabolic (pyruvate) or pharmacological (N-acetyl-l-cysteine) antioxidants were infused intravenously for 30 min before arrest. During cardiac arrest, activities of phosphofructokinase, citrate synthase, aconitase, malate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and glutathione reductase fell by 56, 81, 55, 34, 42, 55, and 45%, respectively, coincident with 50% decline in GSH/GSSG. OCCC effected full recovery of glutathione reductase and partial recovery of citrate synthase and aconitase, in parallel with GSH/GSSG. Phosphofructokinase, malate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase recovered only after cardioversion. Antioxidant pretreatments augmented phosphofructokinase, aconitase, and malate dehydrogenase activities before arrest and enhanced these activities, as well as those of citrate synthase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, during arrest. In conclusion, cardiac arrest reversibly inactivates several important myocardial metabolic enzymes. Antioxidant protection of these enzymes implicates oxidative stress as a principal mechanism of enzyme inactivation during arrest.
Intermittent, normobaric hypoxia confers robust cardioprotection against ischemia-induced myocardial infarction and lethal ventricular arrhythmias. δ-Opioid receptor (DOR) signaling and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in cardioprotective phenomena, but their roles in intermittent hypoxia are unknown. This study examined the contributions of DOR and ROS in mediating intermittent hypoxia-induced cardioprotection. Mongrel dogs completed a 20 day program consisting of 5-8 daily, 5-10 min cycles of moderate, normobaric hypoxia (FIO2 0.095-0.10), with intervening 4 min room air exposures. Subsets of dogs received the DOR antagonist naltrindole (200 μg/kg, sc) or antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (250 mg/kg, po) before each hypoxia session. Twenty-four hours after the last session, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 60 min and then reperfused for 5 h. Arrhythmias detected by electrocardiography were scored according to the Lambeth II conventions. Left ventricles were sectioned and stained with 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride, and infarct sizes were expressed as percentages of the area at risk (IS/AAR). Intermittent hypoxia sharply decreased IS/AAR from 41 ± 5 % (n = 12) to 1.8 ± 0.9 % (n = 9; P < 0.001) and arrhythmia score from 4.1 ± 0.3 to 0.7 ± 0.2 (P < 0.001) vs. non-hypoxic controls. Naltrindole (n = 6) abrogated the cardioprotection with IS/AAR 35 ± 5 % and arrhythmia score 3.7 ± 0.7 (P < 0.001 vs. untreated intermittent hypoxia). N-acetylcysteine (n = 6) interfered to a similar degree, with IS/AAR 42 ± 3 % and arrhythmia score 4.7 ± 0.3 (P < 0.001 vs. untreated intermittent hypoxia). Without the intervening reoxygenations, hypoxia (n = 4) was not cardioprotective (IS/AAR 50 ± 8 %; arrhythmia score 4.5 ± 0.5; P < 0.001 vs. intermittent hypoxia). Thus DOR, ROS and cyclic reoxygenation were obligatory participants in the gradually evolving cardioprotection produced by intermittent hypoxia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.