Additional knowledge was gained about the benefits of PPW technology. Participants were able to continue participating independently in their self-identified community activities using the PPW, and identified comparable ratings of satisfaction and performance with the PPW and the power wheelchair. For some individuals requiring power mobility, the PPW may provide an alternative to the power wheelchair.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries and workplace ergonomics among rural-based sonographers compared to urban-based sonographers. The authors also tested the use of a biomechanical software program to assess load on the spine and upper extremity joints. A mail-in survey was sent to all practicing sonographers in rural Manitoba, and on-site video-taped ergonomic and biomechanical evaluations were completed for four sites. Rural-based sonographers appear to have greater work stress related to waiting lists, use of outdated and non-adjustable equipment, and high client load. They also do not advocate for better working conditions because they are few in number and geographically distant from one another. Use of the biomechanical software proved minimally useful. Information related to industry standards and greater collaboration is needed to promote workplace health for sonographers.

No abstract

Comprehensive burn rehabilitation requires the use of an appropriate burn scar outcome measure (BSOM). The literature reports many BSOMs; however, an objective, practical, inexpensive, valid, reliable, and responsive instrument eludes us. A problem in the development of such a measure is disagreement in which scar properties to include. The objective of this study was to determine the burn scar variables that therapists believe should be included in a BSOM. An Internet survey was administered to burn occupational and physical therapists. The response rate was 38.6% (105 surveys). Of the respondents, 38.1% use a BSOM; of those, 75% use the Vancouver Scar Scale. Reasons why respondents do not use a BSOM (61.9%) are because they are not familiar with available measures, have not found one that is clinically practical, or need more training. The majority (95%) believes that using a BSOM is important, and the following BSOM characteristics were reported as important: reliable, valid, quick, easy, and noninvasive. Respondents indicated that the following properties should be included in a BSOM: pliability (96.2%), vascularity (92.4%), height (87.6%), appearance (75.2%), skin breakdown (74.3%), itch (73.3%), surface texture (70.5%), pigmentation (68.6%), and pain (67.6%). This study suggests that using a BSOM is important despite its inconsistent use, and BSOM education may be valuable. The top three agreed-upon properties for inclusion are already incorporated into the most commonly used BSOM-the Vancouver Scar Scale-suggesting that modifications may be reasonable.