Objective. Due to the rarity of relapsing polychondritis (RP), no randomised clinical trial has been conducted to date and treatment remains empirical. We performed a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy of the main conventional immunosuppressants and biotherapies used in RP. Methods. We searched MEDLINE for original articles without language restriction. Abstracts from American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) were also considered for inclusion. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting on the efficacy of conventional immunosuppressants and biotherapies in adult patients with RP were selected and pooled response rates for each treatment were computed. Results. Of 304 articles and abstracts identified, 31 underwent full-text review, and 11 were included. The studies involved a total of 177 patients, exposed to a total of 247 lines of treatments. The main treatments studied (by number of lines

Background: Pathogenic inflammatory pathways are largely shared between different autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AIDs). This offers the potential to develop a given targeted therapy in several AIDs. Methods: We analyzed two clinical trials registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register) to identify the targeted therapies whose development is shared between at least two of the most common AIDs [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), cutaneous psoriasis (cPso), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), giant cell arteritis (GCA), and multiple sclerosis (MS)] using an in-depth repurposing analysis. Results: We identified 142 shared targeted therapies. The four diseases in which shared targeted therapies were the most numerous were RA ( n = 92), cPso ( n = 67), IBD ( n = 58), and SLE ( n = 56). The two clusters of diseases between which the overlap of targeted therapies was the most important were RA and SLE as well as RA, SpA, cPso, and IBD. The targeted therapies which were shared by five diseases or more were abatacept, ustekinumab, rituximab, anakinra, etanercept, infliximab, secukinumab, tofacitinib, alemtuzumab, tocilizumab, adalimumab, apremilast, baricitinib, belimumab, brodalumab, filgotinib, and upadacitinib. The most frequently targeted molecules and pathways were (by descending frequency): JAK-STAT pathways, Th17 axis, TNF-α, IL-6, costimulation molecules, BAFF, CD20, BTK, chemokines and integrins, IL-1, and type I interferon. Conclusion: Many targeted therapies are developed in several AIDs, reflecting the overlap of pathogenic pathways and potential of drug repurposing. This suggests that a revision of the current, clinically based classification of AIDs towards a more mechanistic-based taxonomy might be relevant.

Aims: With the arrival of conventional synthetic (csDMARDs), biological (bDMARDS) and then targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, the therapeutic arsenal against rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently expanded. However, there are still some unmet needs for patients who do not achieve remission and continue to worsen despite treatments. Of note, most randomized controlled trials show that, for methotrexate-inadequate responders, only 20% of patients are ACR70 responders. With our better understanding of RA pathogenesis, finding new treatments is a necessary challenge. The objective of our study was to analyse the whole pipeline of immunosuppressive and immunomodulating drugs evaluated in RA and describe their mechanisms of action and stage of clinical development. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all drugs in clinical development in RA, in 17 online registries of clinical trials. Results: The search yielded 4652 trials, from which we identified 243 molecules. Those molecules belong to csDMARDs ( n = 22), bDMARDs ( n = 118), tsDMARDs ( n = 103). Twenty-four molecules are already marketed in RA in at least one country: eight csDMARDs, 10 bDMARDs and six tsDMARDs. Molecules under current development are mainly bDMARDs ( n = 34) and tsDMARDs ( n = 33). Seven of those have reached phase III. A large number of molecules (150/243, 61.7%) have been withdrawn. Conclusion: Despite the availability of 24 marketed molecules, the development of new targeted molecules is ongoing with a total of 243 molecules in RA. With seven molecules currently reaching phase III, we can expect an increase in the armamentarium in the years to come.

Background: Antimalarial agents (AMs), mainly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine, are the cornerstone of treatment of cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, many aspects of AM prescription remain empirical. The aim of this study was to assess the modalities of AM prescription among physicians treating patients with lupus and to verify the assumption that AM use is heterogeneous and frequently at variance with international guidelines. Methods: We performed an international cross-sectional study among physicians involved in lupus care, using a web-based survey (from September 2019 to July 2020) addressing the main controversial aspects of AM prescription. Results: A total of 298 physicians [median age: 42 (interquartile range: 17) years, mainly internists and rheumatologists] from 35 countries participated to the study. A total of 93% used HCQ as the first-line AM, 69.5% used fixed doses of AMs (mainly 400 mg/day for HCQ) and only 37.9% adjusted the dose in case of renal failure. The main reasons for measuring HCQ blood levels were suspected non-adherence (55.7%) and failure of AM treatment (34.1%). In case of AM failure, 58.0% added an immunosuppressive agent. In case of remission, 49.7% maintained the same dose of AM, whereas 48.3% reduced the dose. One-third of respondents reported not following the American screening guidelines on AM retinal toxicity and 40.9% started retinal screening from the first year of treatment. Conclusion: This study highlights the strong heterogeneity of AM prescription in lupus, as well as several key unmet needs regarding AMs. This may be improved by developing more comprehensive recommendations and favoring dissemination among physicians.

Systemic sclerosis is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by microvascular impairment and fibrosis of the skin and other organs with poor outcomes. Toxic causes may be involved. We reported the case of a 59-year-old woman who developed an acute systemic sclerosis after two doses of adjuvant chemotherapy by docetaxel and cyclophosphamide for a localized hormone receptor + human epithelial receptor 2—breast cancer. Docetaxel is a major chemotherapy drug used in the treatment of breast, lung, and prostate cancers, among others. Scleroderma-like skin-induced changes (morphea) have been already described for taxanes. Here, we report for the first time a case of severe lung and kidney flare with thrombotic microangiopathy after steroids for acute interstitial lung disease probably induced by anti-RNA polymerase III + systemic sclerosis after docetaxel.