If F is a filter on ω, we say that F is Canjar if the corresponding Mathias forcing does not add a dominating real. We prove that any Borel Canjar filter is F σ , this solves a problem of Hrušák and Minami. We give several examples of Canjar and non-Canjar filters, in particular, we construct a MAD family such that the corresponding Mathias forcing adds a dominating real. This answers a question of Brendle. Then we prove that in all the "classical" models of ZFC there are MAD families whose Mathias forcing does not add a dominating real. We also study ideals generated by branches, and we uncover a close relation between Canjar ideals and the selection principle S f in (Ω, Ω) on subsets of the Cantor space.
In this work we study cardinal invariants of the ideal SP of strongly porous sets on ω 2. We prove that add(SP) = ω 1 , cof(SP) = c and that it is consistent that non(SP) < add(N), answering questions of Hrušák and Zindulka. We also find a connection between strongly porous sets on ω 2 and the Martin number for σ-linked partial orders, and we use this connection to construct a model where all the Martin numbers for σ-k-linked forcings are mutually different.
Following D. Sobota we call a family F of infinite subsets of N a Rosenthal family if it can replace the family of all infinite subsets of N in classical Rosenthal's Lemma concerning sequences of measures on pairwise disjoint sets. We resolve two problems on Rosenthal families: every ultrafilter is a Rosenthal family and the minimal size of a Rosenthal family is exactly equal to the reaping cardinal r. This is achieved through analyzing nowhere reaping families of subsets of N and through applying a paving lemma which is a consequence of a paving lemma concerning linear operators on ℓ n 1 due to Bourgain. We use connections of the above results with free set results for functions on N and with linear operators on c 0 to determine the values of several other derived cardinal invariants.
Following D. Sobota we call a family F \mathcal F of infinite subsets of N \mathbb {N} a Rosenthal family if it can replace the family of all infinite subsets of N \mathbb {N} in the classical Rosenthal lemma concerning sequences of measures on pairwise disjoint sets. We resolve two problems on Rosenthal families: every ultrafilter is a Rosenthal family and the minimal size of a Rosenthal family is exactly equal to the reaping cardinal r \mathfrak r . This is achieved through analyzing nowhere reaping families of subsets of N \mathbb {N} and through applying a paving lemma which is a consequence of a paving lemma concerning linear operators on ℓ 1 n \ell _1^n due to Bourgain. We use connections of the above results with free set results for functions on N \mathbb {N} and with linear operators on c 0 c_0 to determine the values of several other derived cardinal invariants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.