A total of 110 patients of symptomatic otomycosis was investigated, prospectively. Aural swabs were collected on 1st, 7th and 14th day and examined by direct microscopy and culture for fungi. Of these, 80 patients found to be having pure fungal infection, were taken up for mycological and therapeutic study. Fungi belonging to genus Aspergillus were isolated in 76 (95.0%) patients of which Aspergillus niger was the commonest isolate in 46 (57.5%), followed by A. flavus in 27 (33.7%), A. fumigatus in 3 (3.7%), Candida species in 3 (3.7%) and Mucor in 1 (1.2%). The patients were of all age groups but majority were between 21 and 30 years and the male-female ratio was equal. Of the total of 40 male patients, twenty-one were Sikhs using turban. Before developing the symptoms, forty five patients used oil, mixture of oil and garlic juice, antibiotics, steroids, antiseptics or wax solvent as ear drops. Only two patients were diabetic. No patient had fungal infection elsewhere in the body. The patients were called for regular follow-up for three weeks. In forty cases mercurochrome was applied as the antifungal agent after cleaning the external auditory canal, in twenty-three clotrimazole and in rest of the seventeen patients miconazole was used. On 7th day, only 11 (13.7%) patients grew different fungi in culture. They became symptom-free on 14th day and no fungal material could be seen on otoscopy, direct microscopy or culture. Mercurochrome was found to be most effective in these patients.

Introduction Isolated amyloidosis involving the head and neck is a rare entity. The pathophysiology of the localized disease appears to be distinct from that of the systemic counterpart. Systemic progression of the localized disease is unusual, and the prognosis of the localized form is excellent. Objective To describe the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients presenting with localized head and neck subsite amyloidosis. Methods A retrospective chart review of the patients with head and neck amyloidosis identified by the electronic search of the electronic database of the Departments of Pathology and Otorhinolaryngology was performed. The various demographic and clinical data were tabulated. Results In total, seven patients (four females, three males) with localized head and neck amyloidosis (three supraglottic, three lingual and one sinonasal) were identified. Six patients had AL-amyloid deposits, and one patient had AA-amyloid deposits. Supraglottic involvement and that of the base of the tongue were treated surgically using CO2 laser, and these patients were disease-free at the last follow-up. The patient with sinonasal amyloidosis experienced symptom recurrence after six months of the functional endoscopic sinus surgery. All of the patients were screened for systemic amyloidosis with abdominal fat pad biopsy, and were found to be free of systemic spread. Conclusion Isolated head and neck amyloidosis, as opposed to systemic amyloidosis, has an excellent prognosis in terms of survival. Therefore, systemic amyloidosis should be excluded in all cases. The treatment of choice remains surgical excision; however, watchful waiting may be a suitable strategy for mild symptoms or for cases in which the disease was discovered incidentally.

Methotrexate is an antimetabolite drug with antineoplastic and immunomodulatory properties, useful as an antineoplastic agent in various haematological and solid tumours. MTX toxicity can occur because of accidental ingestion/overdose by the patient or because of prescription error. The toxic effects manifest as severe mucositis or as organ damage (bone marrow depression, renal/hepatic injury). The toxicity usually results from parenteral overdose or repeated chronic drug ingestion. Acute high dose ingestion does not result in MTX toxicity because of saturable absorption kinetics. We present a case of MTX toxicity occurring as a result of prescription error resulting in repeat daily dosing of the drug, and the challenges associated with the management of the same, in a patient with multiple comorbidities. The present case emphasizes on a note of caution on the part of the prescriber and the suggestions regarding the measures which can be taken to avoid MTX toxicity.

No abstract