Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal injury. Risk factors for concomitant meniscal injuries have been studied in the adult population but less so in pediatric patients. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between age and body mass index (BMI) and the presence of a concomitant meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients aged <19 years who underwent primary ACLR over a 3.5-year period. Revision ACLR and multiligament knee reconstructions were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with having a meniscal tear at the time of surgery. Subgroup analysis was performed for medial and lateral meniscal tears. Results: Included in this study were 453 patients (230 males, 223 females; median age, 15 years). Of these, 265 patients (58%) had a meniscal tear, including 150 isolated lateral meniscal tears, 53 isolated medial meniscal tears, and 62 patients with both lateral and medial meniscal tears. Median time from injury to surgery was 48 days. For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 16% increase in the adjusted odds of having any meniscal tear (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.27; P = .002), with a 20% increase in the odds of having a medial meniscal tear (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .002) and a 16% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .003). For every 2-point increase in BMI, there was a 12% increase in the odds of having any meniscal tear (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .016) and a 10% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .028). Conclusion: Pediatric patients undergoing ACLR had a 58% incidence of concomitant meniscal pathology. Increasing age and BMI were independent risk factors for these injuries, while no association was found between time to surgery and meniscal pathology.
Objectives: The medial and lateral menisci function to optimize force transmission across the knee by increasing contact area between the femur and tibia, absorbing shock, and transmitting loads. The anterior and posterior meniscus roots anchor the meniscus to bone. Injuries to the meniscus root attachments result in extrusion of the meniscus, impaired distribution of hoop stresses, and progressive degenerative articular wear. As a result of these deleterious effects, there has been increasing emphasis on repair of meniscus root injuries to restore structure and function. The purpose of this study is to describe meniscus root tears, associated injuries, and minimum 2-year treatment outcomes in a series of pediatric patients. Methods: A single-institution, IRB approved, retrospective review was performed of consecutive pediatric patients less than 19 years of age with a meniscus root tear treated with transosseous root repair over a 4-year period. All patients had minimum 24-month clinical follow-up. Partial root tears treated with partial meniscectomy or irreparable root tears were excluded. All meniscus root tears were classified arthroscopically based on the tear types described by LaPradeADDIN EN.CITE 9. The primary outcomes were revision meniscus surgery and patient reported outcome scores (PROs) (Lysholm, Patient Satisfaction, and Tegner activity). Results: Twenty-one patients, 11 males and 10 females with a mean age of 15 years (range 7 – 18 years), met inclusion criteria. There were 15 lateral meniscus root tears and 6 medial meniscus root tears. The tears occurred in the posterior root in 20 patients (95%). The most common injury pattern was a lateral meniscus posterior root tear (14 patients, 67%). 18 patients (86%) had an associated ligament tear: 13 ACL tears and 5 PCL tears. Two root tears occurred in isolation, and both were the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The majority of meniscus root tears (15 patients, 71%) were root avulsions (type 5). Mean follow-up was 42 months (range 25 – 71 months). Three patients had a second surgery on the affected knee. In two patients, one with revision ACL reconstruction and one treated with chondroplasty of the patella, the meniscus root repair was noted to be well healed. A third patient sustained a new injury to the knee 4 years following medial meniscus posterior root repair and underwent partial medial meniscectomy. At final follow-up, PROs were obtained for 17 patients (81%). Mean Lysholm score was 91 (range 51 – 100). Mean patient satisfaction score was 8.7 (range 5 – 10). Fourteen of 16 patients (88%) reported returning to the same or higher level of activity following surgery. Conclusions: Meniscus root tears occur in pediatric patients, most commonly as root avulsions of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus and in association with ACL tears. This is unique as compared to the adult population, in which the medial meniscus posterior root is often injured in isolation and radial tears adjacent the root are the most commonly described injury pattern. In our case series, transosseous root repair resulted in successful outcomes in the majority of patients with durable results at midterm follow-up.
Background: Injuries to the meniscus root attachments result in extrusion of the meniscus, impaired distribution of hoop stresses, and progressive degenerative articular wear. As a result of these deleterious effects, there has been increasing emphasis on repairing meniscus root injuries to restore structure and function. Purpose: To describe meniscus root tear patterns, associated injuries, and outcomes of transosseous meniscus root repair in a series of pediatric patients. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review approved by the institutional review board was performed on consecutive adolescent patients aged <19 years with a meniscus posterior root tear treated with transosseous root repair over 4 years. All patients had a minimum 24-month clinical follow-up. The primary outcomes were revision meniscal surgery, and Lysholm, patient satisfaction, and Tegner activity scores. Results: A total of 20 patients (11 male and 9 female patients), with a mean age of 15.6 years (range, 13-18 years), met the inclusion criteria. There were 14 lateral meniscus root tears and 6 medial meniscus root tears. Seventeen patients (85%) had an associated ligament tear: 12 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and 5 posterior cruciate ligament tears. Two root tears occurred in isolation and both were the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The majority of meniscus root tears (n = 14 patients; 70%) were root avulsions (type 5). The mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 25-71 months). One patient underwent secondary surgery on the affected meniscus after a new injury 4 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained for 16 patients (80%) at a mean 54-month follow-up. The median Lysholm score was 95 (interquartile range [IQR], 90-100). The median patient satisfaction score was 10 (IQR, 8-10). Thirteen of 16 patients (81%) reported returning to the same or higher level of sports after surgery. Conclusion: Meniscus root tears most commonly occur in pediatric patients as root avulsions of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus and in association with ACL tears. This is unique compared with the adult population, in which the medial meniscus posterior root is often injured in isolation from a radial tear adjacent to the root. In our pediatric case series, transosseous root repair resulted in successful outcomes in the majority of patients, with durable results at the midterm follow-up.
Background: The use and misuse of opioid medications is an epidemic and public health emergency. There are currently no standard guidelines for treating perioperative pain in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to describe opioid use among pediatric patients after common orthopaedic surgeries. Methods: Patients between 5 and 20 years of age undergoing one of 7 common orthopaedic surgeries between the years 2018 to 2020 were prospectively studied. Patients and their families completed a medication logbook to track all doses of pain medication and associated pain scores. Results: Three hundred forty-two patients completed the study, including 174 females and 168 males with a mean age of 14.0 years (range, 5 to 20 y). A total of 4351 tablets or liquid doses of the narcotic medication, 44% of the total prescribed, were consumed. Of the prescribed medication,56% remained unused. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was identified to be the only independent predictor of less narcotic use, with a mean of 5.1 tablets (P = 0.003) and 1.7 days (P < 0.01) less opioid consumed among these patients. Thirty-two (9.4%) patients consumed 100% of their prescriptions. Nonmedicinal methods of pain control, most commonly ice, were used by 77% of patients, and this was highly variable between procedures. Physicians were cited as a source of medication information by only 50% of patients, with high variability between procedures. Conclusions: Opioid medication use in children and adolescents after orthopaedic surgery is significantly less than the number of tablets prescribed, with 56% of the medication prescribed remaining unused in the postoperative period. Duration of narcotic use was longer than anticipated with a wide SD (4.7 d +/−3 d). We recommend orthopaedic surgeons responsibly prescribe pain medications using evidence-based data or the results of their own experience monitoring medication consumption. In addition, and important in the setting of the “opioid epidemic,” physicians must counsel patients and families on postoperative pain expectations and appropriate medication use. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prospective case series.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.