Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients are often colonized with Staphylococcus aureus, and staphylococcal biofilms have been reported on adult AD skin lesions. The commensal S epidermidis can antagonize S aureus, although its role in AD is unclear. We sought to characterize S aureus and S epidermidis colonization and biofilm propensity and determine their associations with AD severity, barrier function, and epidermal gene expression in the first US early-life cohort of children with AD, the Mechanisms of Progression of Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children (MPAACH). Methods: The biofilm propensity of staphylococcal isolates was assessed by crystal violet assays. Gene expression of filaggrin and antimicrobial alarmins S100A8 and S100A9 was measured in keratinocyte RNA extracted from skin tape strips. Staphylococcal biofilms sampled from MPAACH skin were visualized using scanning electron microscopy. Results: Sixty-two percent of staphylococcal isolates (sampled from 400 subjects) formed moderate/strong biofilms. Sixty-eight percent of subjects co-colonized with both staphylococcal species exhibited strains that formed cooperative mixed-species biofilms. Scanning electron microscopy verified the presence of staphylococcal biofilms on the skin of MPAACH children. Staphylococcus aureus strains showing higher relative biofilm propensity compared with S epidermidis were associated with increased AD severity (P = .03) and increased lesional and nonlesional transepidermal water loss (P = .01, P = .03). Conclusions: Our data suggest a pathogenic role for S aureus biofilms in AD. We found that strain-level variation in staphylococcal isolates governs the interactions between | 303 GONZALEZ Et AL.
Background: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are often sensitized to food and aeroallergens, but sensitization patterns have not been analysed with biologic measures of disease pathogenicity.
Objective:We sought to define allergen sensitization grouping(s) using unbiased machine learning and determine their associations with skin filaggrin (FLG) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (assesses skin barrier integrity), S100A8 and S100A9 expression (assesses skin inflammation) and AD severity.
Methods:We studied 400 children with AD in the Mechanisms of Progression from Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children (MPAACH) cohort to identify groupings of food and aeroallergen sensitizations. MPAACH is a paediatric AD cohort, aged 1-2, recruited through hospital/community settings between 2016 and 2018. We analysed these groupings' associations with AD biomarkers: skin FLG, S100A8 and S100A9 expression, total IgE, TEWL and AD severity.Results: An unbiased machine learning approach revealed five allergen clusters. The most common cluster (N = 131), SPT PEP, had sensitization to peanut, egg and/or pets. Three low prevalence clusters, which included children with allergen sensitization other than peanut, egg or pets, were combined into SPT Other . SPT NEG included children with no sensitization(s). SPT PEP children had higher median non-lesional TEWL (16.9 g/m 2 /h) and IgE (90 kU/L) compared with SPT OTHER (8.8 g/m 2 /h and 24 kU/L; p = .01 and p < .001) and SPT NEG (9 g/m 2 /h and 26 kU/L; p = .003 and p < .001). SPT PEP children had lower median lesional (0.70) and non-lesional (1.09) FLG expression compared with SPT OTHER (lesional: 0.9; p = .047, non-lesional: 1.78; p = .01) and SPT NEG (lesional: 1.47; p < .001, non-lesional: 2.21; p < .001). There were no differences among groupings in S100A8 or S100A9 expression.
Conclusions and clinical relevance:In this largely clinic-based cohort of young children with AD, allergic sensitization to peanut, egg, cat or dog was associated with more severe disease and skin barrier function but not markers of cutaneous inflammation. These data need replicating in a population-based cohort but may have important implications for understanding the interaction between AD and allergic sensitization. | 667 SHERENIAN Et Al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.