In patients with CD who develop secondary LOR, re-induction may represent an effective and less expensive first-line strategy, reserving dose intensification strategies such as DIS for non-responders.

Background The GEMINI trials established the efficacy of vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and demonstrated a favorable safety profile, suggesting it may be advantageous in older patients at greater risk of treatment-related complications. However, there is a paucity of data exploring the outcomes of vedolizumab in this group. Our objective was to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in older IBD patients within a real-world multicenter UK cohort. Methods A retrospective review of electronic records across 6 UK hospitals was undertaken to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of vedolizumab in IBD patients aged ≥60 at start of therapy. Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission were assessed at weeks 14 and 52, using validated clinical indices, and were compared to historical controls from real-world vedolizumab-treated cohorts unstratified by age. Results Of 74 patients aged 60 years or above (median 66 years), 48 were included in our effectiveness analysis (29 ulcerative colitis, 19 Crohn's disease). Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission at week 14 were 64%, 48% and 30%, respectively. By week 52, the rates of clinical response, remission, and corticosteroid-free remission were 52%, 38%, and 32%, respectively. Six (8%) patients experienced adverse effects. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were comparable to those of age-unstratified vedolizumab-treated cohorts. Conclusion Our 1-year outcome data suggests that vedolizumab is safe and effective in older IBD patients and broadly comparable to cohorts unselected by age.

Background: Virtual clinics represent a novel model of care in inflammatory bowel disease. Their effectiveness in promoting high quality use of biologic therapy and facilitating a treat-to-target approach is unknown. Aim:To evaluate clinical and process-driven outcomes in a virtual clinic compared to standard outpatient care amongst patients receiving intensified anti-TNF therapy for secondary loss of response. Methods:We performed a retrospective multi-centre, parallel, observational cohort study of Crohn's disease patients receiving intensified anti-TNF therapy for secondary loss of response. Objective assessments of disease activity and anti-TNF trough levels at secondary loss of response and during subsequent 6-month semesters, were compared longitudinally between virtual clinic and standard outpatient care cohorts.The primary endpoint was treatment success, with appropriateness of dose intensification, tight disease monitoring and treatment de-escalation representing secondary outcomes.Results: Of 149 patients with similar baseline characteristics, 69 were managed via a virtual clinic and 80 via standard outpatient care. There were higher rates of treatment success in the virtual clinic cohort (60.9 vs 35.0%, P < 0.002). Rates of appropriate dose intensification (82.6% vs 40.0%, P < 0.001), biomarker remission (faecal calprotectin P = 0.002), tight-disease monitoring (84.1% vs 28.8%, P < 0.001) and treatment de-escalation (21.3% vs 10.0%, P = 0.027) also favoured the virtual clinic cohort. Conclusion:This study favoured a virtual clinic-led model-of-care over standard outpatient care in facilitating treatment success as part of an effective treat-to-target approach in Crohn's disease. A virtual clinic model-of-care also improved treatment outcomes and quality of use of intensified anti-TNF therapy through processes that promoted appropriate dose intensification and tight-disease monitoring, while encouraging more frequent dose de-escalation. | 1343SRINIVASAN et Al.