A 91-year-old man with a history of intravesicular BCG therapy for recurrent bladder cancer and bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) presented with left hip pain. He was noted to have a fluid collection over the left lateral hip and hip X-ray showed loosening of the prosthetic hip stem indicative of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). He subsequently underwent removal of the THA and insertion of an antibiotic spacer. He was discharged on intravenous ceftriaxone for presumed culture negative PJI. Intraoperative acid fast bacillus culture later grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, which was then differentiated to M. bovis. The M. bovis infection was thought to be a complication of the patient’s prior BCG therapy. He was initially started on isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol pending cultures and sensitivities; pyrazinamide was discontinued after M. bovis was isolated on culture and susceptibility data confirmed the expected inherent resistance of M. bovis to pyrazinamide. The patient underwent successful THA revision and remains symptom-free at 1 year.

Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for multiple myeloma. The initial infusion is administered over a median of 7.5 hours with subsequent infusions given over 3 to 4 hours. Studies show high incidence of infusion related reactions (IRRs) with the initial dose which decreases with subsequent infusions. Accelerated 90 minute daratumumab infusions following the second dose of standard administration are widely accepted in practice including at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) despite limited data from small safety studies. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of accelerated daratumumab administration compared to standard administration. The primary outcome is the incidence of common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0 grade 1 or higher for IRRs in accelerated and standard infusions. Secondary outcomes include non-IRR adverse events and amount of supportive care medications used pre- and post- and during accelerated and standard infusions. A total of seventy five patients received a daratumumab infusion between November 2015 and August 2019. There were a total of 420 daratumumab infusions evaluated, 317 (75.5%) were standard infusions of which 152 infusions were standard infusions that preceded an accelerated infusion. There were a total of 103 (24.5%) accelerated infusions. IRRs occurred in a total of 38 (9%) of the infusions with CTCAE grade 2 reactions occurring in total of 21 (5%) infusions and grade 1 occurring in 15 (3.6%) infusions. Overall accelerated daratumumab administration is safe and well tolerated when given following at least two standard infusions.