No abstract

No abstract

With the increasing reliance on the constant flow of electricity, risk-based management strategies are increasingly needed to ensure that with limited available resources, the grid can maintain high reliability and resilience. A growing concern in meeting this objective is the impact of climatic extremes, as the wide exposure of the power grid infrastructure has resulted in a system that is inherently vulnerable to extreme climatic hazards which are exacerbated by climate change. Analyzing the likelihood of damage induced by extreme hazards is critical for developing riskinformed strategies. Overhead structures, in particular, may experience a wide spectrum of damage types and degrees during hurricanes. Beyond the collapse state of transmission towers, which has been investigated in the past, non-collapse damage states in lattice towers require further attention as they can assist with performancebased design, grid recovery planning, and hardening decisions in preparation for extreme events. The present study establishes a set of performance-based limit states for lattice transmission towers subject to wind-induced extreme loadings. Specifically, five damage states including no damage, slight, moderate, and extensive damage, and collapse are defined. These limit states are founded on the nonlinear behavior of lattice towers and the type and severity of failures in tower elements and connections, as they relate to the repair or replacement requirements of towers. Focusing on a double circuit vertical steel lattice transmission tower as a case study, the proposed limit states are evaluated by generating a large number of random realizations of a diverse set of uncertain variables including those related to wind

No abstract

Natural hazards such as earthquakes and typhoons pose a considerable threat to the power transmission grid. In regions prone to both hazards, the overhead transmission infrastructure may experience multi-hazard effects where two consecutive hazards can occur within an interval shorter than the time that would be needed to repair the system for damages occurred in the first event. This consequently increases the susceptibility to damage during the subsequent hazard.