ObjectiveTo assess the effects of different oral antithrombotic drugs that prevent saphenous vein graft failure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 25 January 2019.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials of participants (aged ≥18) who received oral antithrombotic drugs (antiplatelets or anticoagulants) to prevent saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Main outcome measuresThe primary efficacy endpoint was saphenous vein graft failure and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction and death.ResultsThis review identified 3266 citations, and 21 articles that related to 20 randomised controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis. These 20 trials comprised 4803 participants and investigated nine different interventions (eight active and one placebo). Moderate certainty evidence supports the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with either aspirin plus ticagrelor (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.79, number needed to treat 10) or aspirin plus clopidogrel (0.60, 0.42 to 0.86, 19) to reduce saphenous vein graft failure when compared with aspirin monotherapy. The study found no strong evidence of differences in major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and death among different antithrombotic therapies. The possibility of intransitivity could not be ruled out; however, between-trial heterogeneity and incoherence were low in all included analyses. Sensitivity analysis using per graft data did not change the effect estimates.ConclusionsThe results of this network meta-analysis suggest an important absolute benefit of adding ticagrelor or clopidogrel to aspirin to prevent saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Dual antiplatelet therapy after surgery should be tailored to the patient by balancing the safety and efficacy profile of the drug intervention against important patient outcomes.Study registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42017065678.

Heart failure (HF) is a significant public health concern. Specialized HF clinics provide the optimal environment to address the complex needs of these patients and improve outcomes. The current and growing population of patients with HF outstrips the ability of these clinics to deliver care. Integrated care is defined as health services that are managed and delivered so that people receive a seamless continuum of health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, disease management, rehabilitation, and palliative care services. This approach requires coordination across different levels and sites of care within and beyond the health sector, according to changing patient needs throughout their lives. The spoke-hub-and-node (SHN) model represents an organization of care that works collaboratively with the primary care sector and is highly integrated with community-based multidisciplinary teams of health care professionals and specialty care. The purpose of this article is to analyze the requirements for successful implementation of SHN models. We consider the respective roles of HF clinics, HF nurse specialists, pharmacists, palliative care teams, telemonitoring, and solo practitioners. We also discuss levels of care delivery and the importance of patient stratification and patient flow. The SHN approach has the potential to build on and improve the chronic care model (CCM) to deliver centralized services to preserve high-quality patient-centred care at affordable costs.

Background Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction represents approximately 50% of the 600,000 Canadians currently living with HF and over 90,000 new cases diagnosed each year. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan, demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization over standard of care therapy. Methods The potential magnitude of benefit in Canada with respect to preventing or postponing deaths and reducing hospitalizations resulting from its optimal implementation in patients with HF with an ejection fraction <40% was estimated based on published sources. Results Of the potentially eligible 225,562 patients, this would amount to the prevention of 4699 cardiovascular deaths and first HF hospitalizations, 3698 thirty-day HF readmissions, and 2820 deaths due to all-cause mortality. The number of patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan nationally in 2018 was 27,267. This represents approximately 12% of the calculated eligible population for this therapy in Canada. Conclusions The findings from this analysis suggest that a substantial number of deaths, hospitalizations, and HF readmissions could potentially be avoided by optimal usage of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in Canada. This emphasizes the importance of rapidly and appropriately implementing evidence-based medications into routine clinical practice, to achieve the best possible outcomes for our patients with HF and to reduce the high burden and cost of HF in Canada.