Objectives To determine the prevalence of non-prescription naloxone and sterile syringe sales, factors associated with non-prescription sales, geospatial access to non-prescription naloxone and syringe selling pharmacies, and targets for potential interventions. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants Massachusetts has experienced steep increases in reported opioid overdoses and hepatitis C virus (HCV) cases in the past decade. Pharmacists have the potential to play a substantial role in increasing access to non-prescription naloxone and sterile syringes, which can reverse opioid overdoses and decrease HCV transmission, respectively. We completed brief telephone surveys with 809 of 1,042 retail pharmacies across Massachusetts (response rate=77.6%) during 2015 to assess experience with non-prescription sales of naloxone and sterile syringes. Outcome Measures Our primary outcomes were the stocking and selling of naloxone in the pharmacy (yes/no) for non-prescription sales, and non-prescription syringe sales (yes/no). We conducted multivariable regression analyses and created maps using a geographic information system (GIS) to identify factors associated with non-prescription sales of naloxone and sterile syringes, and to improve our understanding geospatial access to pharmacy-based naloxone and syringe sales. Results Over 97% of pharmacies reported selling sterile syringes without requiring a prescription and 45% of pharmacies reported stocking and selling naloxone. Factors associated with non-prescription sales included: hours of operation, experience with and interest in harm reduction activities, and presence in an opioid overdose hotspot. Geographic access to non-prescription sale of sterile syringes is wide-spread, while geospatial access to naloxone is more limited. Training to better understand the benefits, applications, and distribution needs of naloxone is of interest to surveyed pharmacists. Conclusion Access to sterile syringes through non-prescription sales is strong across Massachusetts and, while over 350 pharmacies (45%) reported stocking and selling naloxone to prevent opioid overdose deaths, there is much room for improvement in access, and training among pharmacy staff.

BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) infections have increased during the past decade but little is known about geographic clustering patterns.MethodsWe used a unique analytical approach, combining geographic information systems (GIS), spatial epidemiology, and statistical modeling to identify and characterize HCV hotspots, statistically significant clusters of census tracts with elevated HCV counts and rates. We compiled sociodemographic and HCV surveillance data (n = 99,780 cases) for Massachusetts census tracts (n = 1464) from 2002 to 2013. We used a five-step spatial epidemiological approach, calculating incremental spatial autocorrelations and Getis-Ord Gi* statistics to identify clusters. We conducted logistic regression analyses to determine factors associated with the HCV hotspots.ResultsWe identified nine HCV clusters, with the largest in Boston, New Bedford/Fall River, Worcester, and Springfield (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, we found that HCV hotspots were independently and positively associated with the percent of the population that was Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04, 1.09) and the percent of households receiving food stamps (AOR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.74). HCV hotspots were independently and negatively associated with the percent of the population that were high school graduates or higher (AOR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.93) and the percent of the population in the “other” race/ethnicity category (AOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.91).ConclusionWe identified locations where HCV clusters were a concern, and where enhanced HCV prevention, treatment, and care can help combat the HCV epidemic in Massachusetts. GIS, spatial epidemiological and statistical analyses provided a rigorous approach to identify hotspot clusters of disease, which can inform public health policy and intervention targeting. Further studies that incorporate spatiotemporal cluster analyses, Bayesian spatial and geostatistical models, spatially weighted regression analyses, and assessment of associations between HCV clustering and the built environment are needed to expand upon our combined spatial epidemiological and statistical methods.

BackgroundLittle is known about access to health insurance among people who inject drugs (PWID) who attend syringe exchange programs (SEPs). The goal of the current study was to assess perceptions of SEP staff, including health navigators and program managers, on access to health insurance and healthcare access among SEP clients following implementation of state and federal policies to enhance universal healthcare access in Massachusetts.MethodsBetween December 2014 and January 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews (n = 14) with SEP staff, including both program managers and health navigators, to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to health insurance enrollment and access to enhanced referrals among SEP clients. We developed a preliminary coding scheme from the interview guide and used a grounded theory approach to guide inclusion of subsequent thematic codes that emanated from the data. We analyzed the coded data thematically in an iterative fashion using a consensus-based approach.ResultsWe identified five primary themes that emerged from the qualitative interviews, including high levels of health insurance enrollment among SEP clients; barriers to enrolling in health insurance; highly needed referrals to services, including improved access to substance use disorder treatment and hepatitis C virus treatment; barriers to referring clients to these highly needed services; and recommendations for policy change.ConclusionsWhile barriers to enrollment and highly needed referrals remain, access to and enrollment in healthcare insurance plans among PWID at SEPs in Massachusetts are high. With the uncertain stability of the Affordable Care Act following the US presidential election of 2016, our findings summarize the opportunities and challenges that are connected to health insurance and healthcare access in Massachusetts. SEPs can play an important role in facilitating access to health insurance and enhancing access to preventive health and primary care.