PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Novartis Inc and NIH National Cancer Institute core grant.

Only 5% of breast cancers are explained by highly penetrant multisystem autosomal dominant hereditary disorders. Though another 20-30% has a familial presentation, the genetic and other etiologies are still not well understood. Genetic testing is now widely available and multiple professional societies have published guidelines for testing and management. Genetic testing trends include utilization of multi-gene panels that take advantage of next-generation sequencing as well as testing for low- and moderate-penetrance susceptibility genes.

Purpose 2015 NCCN guidelines recommend genetic counseling and germline BRCA mutation testing be offered to women under age 60 with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). As a result of the 2010 ASCO/CAP guidelines in breast cancer, patients with breast cancers that are ER or PR low-positive (1–9% on immunohistochemistry) are no longer strictly considered to have TNBC and may not be referred for genetic counseling. However, the incidence of BRCA mutation in patients with hormone receptor (HR) low-positive breast cancers remains unknown, and current ASCO/CAP guidelines may result in under-testing for BRCA mutation. Methods We reviewed a prospectively maintained research database of breast cancer patients evaluated at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2014, identifying 314 patients with ER<10%, PR<10%, HER-2 neu negative breast cancers with known BRCA mutation status. Results 314 patients had breast cancers expressing ER and PR <10%; 238 (75.8%) had HR negative (ER and PR <1%) cancers and 76 (24.2%) had HR low-positive (ER and/or PR 1–9%) cancers. Among patients with HR negative tumors, 86 of 238 (36.1%) had a BRCA 1/2 mutation, while among the HR low-positive group, 30 of 76 (39.5%) had a BRCA 1/2 mutation. In multivariate analysis, HR status (HR<1% vs. HR 1–9%) was not significantly associated with BRCA 1/2 mutation. Conclusion The incidence of BRCA 1/2 mutation is similar in patients with HR low-positive and HR negative breast cancers. We recommend offering genetic counseling and BRCA testing to patients under age 60 with ER low-positive breast cancers.