Background and Purpose/Objective: Evidence supporting the effect of community-based cancer-specific physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) services on cancer-related disability is limited. We examined the effect of community-based outpatient cancer-specific PT/OT for performance-based and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for adults with cancer. Methods: This retrospective, pre/posttreatment study included 185 adults seen for cancer rehabilitation (PT/OT). Demographic and clinical data were patient-reported. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures included global physical health (GPH) and global mental health (GMH) scale (10 item); physical function (PF; 4-item), and ability to participate in social roles and activities (SRA; 4-item). Performance-based measures included hand grip strength (HGS) Rehabilitation Oncology
e19325 Background: Adults with cancer often struggle with persistent symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QoL), physical and social function. Cancer rehabilitation delivered by a trained physical and/or occupational therapist (PT/OT) is recommended. However, evidence is lacking regarding the impact of community-based PT/OT on patients' functioning. Methods: We assessed adults (≥ 18 years) who completed cancer-specific visits in routine care at two outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Demographic and clinical data was patient-reported. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures included: Global Physical Health (GPH) and Mental Health (GMH) scale (10 item); Physical Function (PF; 4-item), and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (SRA; 4-item). Hand grip strength (HGS) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) were administered by PT/OT. We compared outcomes collected during the first and final therapy evaluations using paired samples t-test and calculated effect size using Cohen’s d. We used independent t-test to compare mean pre-post change between patients on active treatment versus post-treatment. Results: Patients (N= 185) were predominantly female (75%), 41-64 years old (57%), and majority receiving cancer treatment (58%). Most (N =115, 62%) completed at least one follow-up evaluation over 6 weeks. From pre to post therapy, a significant (p<.05; d = 0 .35-.21) effect was observed for GPH, SRA, HGS, and TUG. There was no difference in the average improvement between active and post-treatment groups. Conclusions: Community-based cancer-specific PT/OT has a significant impact on the well-being and functioning of adults with cancer. Evidence supports the utilization of community-based, cancer-specific PT/OT throughout the cancer-care continuum. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.