6535 Background: Addressing unmet SDoH needs may reduce interruptions to cancer care caused by ED visits and hospitalizations (EDH). We aimed to determine feasibility of systematic screening for unmet patient-reported SDoH needs within a large tertiary academic comprehensive cancer center and association of unmet needs with EDH. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of SDoH needs among new oncology patient (pts) consults from 5/15-9/21 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DCFI). Pts completed an intake questionnaire including demographics, disease, and SDoH needs of financial distress, health literacy/numeracy, social isolation on a dichotomous or 5-point Likert scale. We ran bivariate and multivariable models on the association between demographics, SDoH and EDH within 30 days of consult using robust generalized estimating equations controlling for clustering by consult provider. Results: 125,997 unique new consults were seen from 5/15 – 9/21 of which 20,913 completed the intake questionnaire and were alive at 30 days after consult. Respondents were age 40-64 (50%), female (60%), non-Hispanic (84%), White (90%) and English speaking (97%), and 7% had an EDH within 30 days of consult. The most reported SDoH need was limited health numeracy (26%). In bivariate analysis, factors associated with ED visits were: non-English language, lung or GU/GYN cancer, living > 25 mi from DFCI and limited health literacy and numeracy (all p < 0.05). Demographics associated with hospitalizations included: White race and English as a primary language (EPL) (both p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis showed female gender (OR 1.53, p < 0.01), lung (OR 3.22*) and GU/GYN (OR 2.21*) (p < 0.05 for both) cancer, and living > 25 mi from DFCI (OR 2.50, p < 0.0001) were associated with increased likelihood of ED visit while EPL (OR 1.80, p < 0.05) and GU/GYN (OR 1.65, p < 0.01*) cancer were associated with increased likelihood of hospitalization. Conclusions: It is feasible to systematically screen for unmet SDoH which are associated with increased frequency of ED visits. Differences in characteristics associated with ED vs. hospitalization could indicate possible bias or suggest SDoH needs as a reason for avoidance of costly medical care. Further study will expand SDoH screening and measure impact of resource matching to reduce disruptions to cancer care. [Table: see text]

No abstract

BACKGROUND: The WHO defines social determinants of health (SDoH) as “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live and age” which includes factors such as housing and food insecurity, employment, and social support and can account for 30-55% of health outcomes. Addressing unmet SDoH needs may reduce interruptions to cancer care caused by ED visits and hospitalizations (EDH). We aimed to determine feasibility of systematic patient-reported SDoH collection at a large academic cancer center and association of unmet SDoH needs with EDH.METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of SDoH needs among new oncology patient (pt) consults from 5/15-9/21at Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DCFI). Pts completed an intake questionnaire including demographic, disease, as well as SDOH needs on a dichotomous or 5-point Likert scale, specifically health literacy (“how confident are you in filling out medical forms?”), health numeracy (“how confident are you in understanding medical statistics?”), financial distress (“how difficult is it for you, or your family, to meet monthly payments on your/your family’s bills?”) and social isolation (“do you currently live alone?”). We ran bivariate and multivariable models on the association between demographics, SDoH and EDH within 30 days of initial oncology visit using robust generalized estimating equations controlling for clustering by consult provider. RESULTS: 125,997new consults were seen from 05/15-09//21, of which 20,913 completed the intake questionnaire and were alive at 30 days of consult. Of those pts, most were female (60%), aged 40-64 (50%), White (90%), non-Hispanic (84%), primarily English-speaking (9%) and 7% had an EDH within 30 days of their 1st outpatient visit. The most reported SDOH need was limited health numeracy (26%). In bivariate analysis, factors associated with ED visits included: limited English proficiency lung or GU/GYN cancer, living &gt; 25 mi.from DFCI, and limited health literacy and numeracy (all p&lt;0.05). Demographics associated with hospitalizations included: White race and English as primary language (EPL) (both p&lt;0.05). Multivariable analysis showed female gender (OR 1.53, p &lt; 0.01), lung (OR 3.22*) and GU/GYN (OR 2.21*) (p &lt; 0.05 for both) cancer, and living &gt; 25 mi from DFCI (OR 2.50, p &lt; 0.0001) were associated with increased likelihood of ED visit while EPL (OR 1.80, p&lt;0.05) and GU/GYN (OR 1.65, p&lt;0.01*) cancer were associated with increased likelihood of hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to systematically screen for unmet SDoH which are associated with increased frequency of ED visits. Differences in characteristics associated with ED vs. hospitalization could indicate possible bias or suggest SDoH needs as a reason for avoidance of costly medical care. Further study will expand both the content and site of SDoH data collection, non-English languages used for data collection, and measure impact of resource matching to reduce disruptions to cancer care. *Compared to breast cancer Citation Format: Ashley Odai-Afotey, Ellana Haakenstad, Sunyi Zhang, Bridget A. Neville, Stuart Lipsitz, Nadine J. McCleary. Feasibility of systemic SDOH collection and associated resource utilization at a large academic cancer center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5939.

e18554 Background: Low-income and minority women are less likely to receive breast cancer treatments and have higher mortality rates compared with other women.We examined economic hardship, health literacy, and numeracy by race/ethnicity and whether these factors were associated with differences in receipt of recommended treatment. Methods: We conducted a telephone survey in 2018-2020 of adult women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2013-2016 at three centers in Boston and New York. We asked women about treatment receipt and factors contributing to decision-making. We used X2 and Fischer exact tests to examine associations between economic distress, health literacy/numeracy, and treatment receipt by race/ethnicity. Results: Among 326 respondents (AAPOR cooperation rate 63-80% across sites), 55% were Non-Hispanic (NH) White, 23% were NH Black, and 14% Hispanic; 15% were Medicaid-insured. Due to item non-response, sample sizes ranged from 294-315 per question. A substantial proportion of women, and particularly Black and Hispanic women, reported economic distress, worse finances over time, and low literacy/numeracy (Table). Overall, 7% (n = 22) did not initiate at least one recommended treatment. Although we observed no differences in treatment by race/ethnicity (p = 0.70), those not initiating recommended treatment(s) reported more worry about paying large medical bills (52% vs. 27%) and covering visit costs (27 vs. 10%); p < .05 for both. Conclusions: In a diverse sample of breast cancer survivors, financial distress was common, particularly for non-White participants; non-White women also had lower literacy/numeracy. Although we observed some associations of these factors (but not race/ethnicity) with less receipt of recommended treatments, because few women declined treatments, understanding the scope of impact is limited. However, our results highlight the importance of up-front and longer-term assessments of resource needs and allocation of support for breast cancer survivors. Novelty of this work includes the granular measures on financial distress and the focus on health literacy/numeracy among a diverse population.[Table: see text]