Hard carbon (HC) is an attractive anode material for grid-level sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) due to the widespread availability of carbon, its high specific capacity, and low electrochemical working potential. However, the issues of low first cycle Coulombic efficiency and poor rate performance of HC need to be addressed for it to become a practical long-life solution for NIBs. These drawbacks appear to be electrolyte dependent, since ether-based electrolytes can largely improve the performance compared with carbonate electrolytes. An explanation for the mechanism behind these performance differences is critical for the rational design of highly reversible sodium storage. Combining gas chromatography, Raman spectroscopy, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, this work demonstrates that the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is the key difference between ether-and carbonated-based electrolyte, which determines the charge transfer kinetics and the extent of parasitic reactions. Although both electrolytes show no residual sodium stored in the HC bulk structure, the uniform and conformal SEI formed by the ether-based electrolyte enables improved cycle efficiency and rate performance. These findings highlight a pathway to achieve long-life grid-level NIBs using HC anodes through interfacial engineering.
Hard carbon (HC) is an attractive anode material for sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) because it can be made from biomass or plastic, has a high capacity of ~300 mAh/g, and an extremely low average voltage near 0V. When fabricated with cathodes free of Li, Ni, and Co, NIBs using HC anodes are a promising approach for grid storage because they are energy-dense, sustainable, and have a low cost of energy. In order for these batteries to become a practical long-life solution, the issues of low first coulombic efficiency and poor rate performance of HC in conventional carbonate electrolytes need to be addressed. Two mechanisms that potentially cause these issues to occur are changes to the HC structure affecting sodium storage and the formation of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI). The proper selection of electrolyte is critical for controlling these mechanisms. To observe and characterize these mechanisms, we compared HC using a conventional carbonate electrolyte, 1M NaPF6 in propylene carbonate (PC), with a high performing glyme based electrolyte, 1M NaBF4 in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME). Compared to the poor rate capability of HC in PC electrolyte, HC in TEGDME electrolyte shows an excellent rate capability of ~265 mAh/g at C/20 and ~260 mAh/g at C/3. Titration gas chromatography and Raman spectroscopy were used to show that the HC with either electrolyte had the same sodium storage mechanism with no “stuck” sodium in the HC structure after the first cycle. These observations suggest that SEI formation is responsible for the irreversible capacity differences. The SEI formation was explored with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The PC electrolyte’s SEI is found to be thick, fluffy, irregular and composed of polyesters, alkyl carbonates, NaxPFyOz, and NaF. The TEGDME electrolyte’s SEI is found to be thin, conformal, uniform, and composed of polyethers, sodium alkoxides, NaxBFyOz, and NaF. Additionally, the PC electrolyte’s SEI is rate dependent with more unstable products formed at high rates whereas the TEGDME electrolyte’s SEI is not rate dependent. These findings show that HC anode’s rate capability is controlled by the quality of the SEI formed by the electrolyte rather than the HC material structure. This model of rate and electrolyte dependent SEI indicates that SEI engineering is a pathway to improve HC as an anode for long-life grid-level NIBs. Figure 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.