Cerebellar infarction, a rare category of stroke, is often misdiagnosed but not given much importance in the available literature. Its presentation overlaps with symptoms of other neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and systemic conditions and therefore is nonspecific. Early diagnosis and management of cerebellar strokes are of utmost importance as the lack of a proper diagnosis may increase overall morbidity and mortality. Lack of awareness of the warning signs and symptoms, non-specificity of symptoms, absence of neurological deficits, and imaging discrepancies are some of the factors contributing to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. If symptomatology is considered, it is found that symptoms of posterior circulation stroke were more frequently misdiagnosed compared to anterior circulation. Nausea and vomiting increased the chance further. Some other rare presentations include gastrointestinal symptoms, isolated vertigo, and symptoms of inner ear disease. Overdependence on radiological investigations often masks the significance of clinical examination. Ischemic stroke may appear normal in the initial 48 hours in the computed tomography scan of the brain or bony artefacts may hide the lesion. Permanent disabling deficits can follow a cerebellar stroke and the complications, which include hydrocephalus, brain stem compression, and gait abnormalities, necessitate prompt identification and management. In this review article, we aim at analysing various case reports of cerebellar infarction, the most common presentations that were underevaluated, and their outcomes, thereby highlighting the importance of proper diagnosis and reporting of cerebellar infarction in the future. A thorough knowledge of the association between various clinical presentations of cerebellar stroke and its misdiagnosis helps clinicians to be more vigilant about the disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.