Prognostic II.

The objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve surgery for migraine headaches and to bibliometrically analyze all anatomical studies relevant to migraine surgery. Summary Background Data: Migraines rank as the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the availability of conservative management options, individuals suffer from refractive migraines which are associated with poor quality of life. Migraine surgery, defined as the peripheral nerve decompression/trigger site deactivation, is a relatively novel treatment strategy for refractory migraines. Methods: EMBASE and the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) were systematically searched for relevant articles according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted from studies which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses were performed to assess complication rates. Meta-analyses were run using the random effects model for overall effects and within subgroup fixed-effect models were used. Results: A total of 68 studies (38 clinical, 30 anatomical) were included in this review. There was a significant overall reduction in migraine intensity (P < 0.001, SE ¼ 0.22, I 2 ¼ 97.9), frequency (P < 0.001, SE ¼ 0.17, I 2 ¼ 97.7), duration (P < 0.001, SE ¼ 0.15, I 2 ¼ 97), and migraine headache index (MHI, P < 0.001, SE ¼ 0.19, I 2 ¼ 97.2) at follow-up. A total of 35 studies reported on migraine improvement (range: 68.3%-100% of participants) and migraine elimination (range: 8.3%-86.5% of participants). 32.1% of participants in the clinical studies reported complications for which the most commonly reported complications being paresthesia and numbness, which was mostly transient, (12.11%) and itching (4.89%). Conclusion: This study demonstrates improved migraine outcomes and an overall decrease in MHI as well as strong evidence for the safety profile and complication rate of migraine surgery.

Study DesignProspective study.PurposeWe aimed to validate the Persian version of the modified Oswestry disability questionnaire (MODQ) in patients with low back pain.Overview of LiteratureModified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire is a well-known condition-specific outcome measure that helps quantify disability in patients with lumbar syndromes.MethodsTo test the validity in a pilot study, the Persian MODQ was administered to 25 individuals with low back pain. We then enrolled 200 consecutive patients with low back pain to fill the Persian MODQ as well as the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Convergent validity of the MODQ was tested using the Spearman's correlation coefficient between the MODQ and SF-36 subscales. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's α coefficient were measured to test the reliability between test and retest and internal consistency of all items, respectively.ResultsICC for individual items ranged from 0.43 to 0.80 showing good reliability and reproducibility of each individual item. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.69 showing good internal consistency across all 10 items of the Persian MODQ. Total MODQ score showed moderate to strong correlation with the eight subscales and the two domains of the SF-36. The highest correlation was between the MODQ and the physical functioning subscale of the SF-36 (r=–0.54, p<0.001) and the physical component domain of the SF-36 (r=–0.55, p<0.001) showing that MODQ is measuring what it is supposed to measure in terms of disability and physical function.ConclusionsPersian version of the MODQ is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of the disability following low back pain.

Bones comprise a significant percentage of human weight and have important physiologic and structural roles. Bone remodeling occurs when healthy bone is renewed to maintain bone strength and maintain calcium and phosphate homeostasis. It proceeds through four phases: (1) cell activation, (2) resorption, (3) reversal, and (4) bone formation. Bone healing, on the other hand, involves rebuilding bone following a fracture. There are two main types of bone healing, primary and secondary. Inflammation plays an integral role in both bone remodeling and healing. Therefore, a tightly regulated inflammatory response helps achieve these two processes, and levels of inflammation can have detrimental effects on bone healing. Other factors that significantly affect bone healing are inadequate blood supply, biomechanical instability, immunosuppression, and smoking. By understanding the different mechanisms of bone healing and the factors that affect them, we may have a better understanding of the underlying principles of bony fixation and thereby improve patient care.

Microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer patients was assessed, and the clinicopathological associations were evaluated in northeastern Iran, which is a high-risk region for gastrointestinal malignancies. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status of tumoral tissue, compared to normal tissue, was assessed with a standard panel of MSI markers on paraffin-embedded surgically resected tissues from 67 consecutive sporadic colorectal cancer patients. Eleven of the patients were under 40 years old. Female patients were significantly younger than male patients (mean age 54.2 vs 62.1 years, P = 0.020). MSI analysis revealed 18 cases of MSI-H (26.9%), 11 MSI-L (16.4%) and 38 MSS (microsatellite stable tumors; 56.7%). While a greater proportion of patients consisted of males, 56.7 vs 43.3% females, MSI-H was more frequent in females (34.5 vs 21.5%). MSI was associated with proximal location of tumor (P = 0.003) and lower stages of tumor (P = 0.002), while MSS tumors were associated with node metastasis. MSI has a higher frequency in sporadic colorectal cancer patients, suggesting that molecular epidemiology of the genetic alterations involved in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis has a different pattern in the Iranian population, which deserves further epidemiological attention. The high frequency of MSI-H in this population suggests that we should look at microsatellite instability prior to chemotherapy to determine the most appropriate chemotherapeutic strategy in our population.