Numerous bacterial genetic markers are available for the molecular detection of human sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters. However, widespread application is hindered by a lack of knowledge regarding geographical stability, limiting implementation to a small number of well-characterized regions. This study investigates the geographic distribution of five human-associated genetic markers (HF183/BFDrev, HF183/BacR287, BacHum-UCD, BacH, and Lachno2) in municipal wastewaters (raw and treated) from 29 urban and rural wastewater treatment plants (750–4 400 000 population equivalents) from 13 countries spanning six continents. In addition, genetic markers were tested against 280 human and nonhuman fecal samples from domesticated, agricultural and wild animal sources. Findings revealed that all genetic markers are present in consistently high concentrations in raw (median log10 7.2–8.0 marker equivalents (ME) 100 mL–1) and biologically treated wastewater samples (median log10 4.6–6.0 ME 100 mL–1) regardless of location and population. The false positive rates of the various markers in nonhuman fecal samples ranged from 5% to 47%. Results suggest that several genetic markers have considerable potential for measuring human-associated contamination in polluted environmental waters. This will be helpful in water quality monitoring, pollution modeling and health risk assessment (as demonstrated by QMRAcatch) to guide target-oriented water safety management across the globe.

Aims:  The goal of this study was to characterize enteric virus concentrations and their infectivity in a variety of limited‐contact recreation and bathing waters, including Great Lakes beaches, inland lakes, rivers, and an effluent‐dominated urban waterway. Additionally, we evaluated associations between point sources of human faecal pollution and enterovirus and adenovirus presence and concentrations. Methods and Results:  Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and two cell culture lines were used to identify and quantify viruses in water samples. The presence of human adenoviruses F was strongly associated with effluent‐dominated waters (odds ratio 6·1, confidence interval 2·3, 15·7), as was adenovirus concentration; though, neither enterovirus presence nor concentration was associated with an effluent source. Samples with high concentrations of qPCR targets all tested positive by cell culture on both cell lines, although qPCR target concentrations were not correlated with culture values. Conclusions:  Adenovirus was strongly associated with point sources of human faecal pollution while enterovirus was not, indicating that adenovirus measured by qPCR is a better target than enterovirus for identifying wastewater discharges in recreational freshwaters. Significance and Impact of the Study:  The development of monitoring for enteric human viral pathogens at recreational waters should include adenovirus testing. Further research is needed to interpret the results of qPCR testing in relationship to the presence of infectious viruses using cell culture.

No abstract