Background/Objectives. The correct identification of the different stages of skeletal maturity is a crucial issue in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions. The hand-wrist analysis and cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) methods are the most frequently employed methods for determining the stage of skeletal maturity in orthodontics. Since these methods require X-ray exposure, a new objective and less invasive method is needed. The aim of this study was to develop other models for prediction of cervical vertebral maturational stages and also growth phases using chronological age (CA), salivary insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Subjects and Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 55 healthy subjects in the age range of 7 to 20 years were included. Their skeletal maturity was assessed through Baccetti’s 6-stage CVM method. In addition, their salivary IGF-1 level, salivary ALP level, and CA were determined. Multinomial logistic regressions were utilized to predict the cervical stage and also growth phase based on CA, salivary IGF-1, and salivary ALP in 7 different models. Results. A strong positive correlation was found between CA and cervical stages ( r = 0.836 , P < 0.001 ). Based on the regression model analysis, the model which combined IGF-1, ALP, and CA provided the best prediction at P < 0.001 with McFadden’s pseudo R 2 value of 0.552 for cervical stage prediction and 0.646 for growth phase prediction. In particular, its predictive ability for the prepubertal, pubertal, and postpubertal growth phases was 95%, 80%, and 90%, respectively. Conclusions. A new model with the combination of salivary IGF-1 and ALP with CA can be used as a less invasive method to determine the cervical stage and also growth phase with high predictive ability in healthy subjects.
Background Treating oral mucosal lesions of Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) disease is usually challenging for clinicians. We studied the treatment outcomes of the oral PV patients referred to the Oral Medicine Department of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from 2004 to 2018. Methods The medical records of 54 oral PV patients with histopathological confirmation who were treated by a single protocol were studied. The protocol consisted of initial treatment with 1 mg/kg/day of oral prednisolone for all patients. After 4–6 weeks, all patients were prescribed 40 mg of prednisolone. If lesion recovery was not observed or new lesions had developed, adjuvant therapy (maximum dose of 200 mg per day of Azathioprine (AZA)) was initiated anytime during the treatment. The oral prednisolone dosage was gradually tapered to 5 mg/alternate day in 9 months. Results 47 patients were included in the study. 34.04% were male and 65.96% were female with a mean age of 41.83 ± 12.520. The mean follow-up period was 50.806 ± 44.417 months (over 4 years). The severity of oral involvement was mild in 21.27%, moderate in 36.17%, and severe in 42.6%. During treatment, all patients except one experienced complete remission. The mean time to achieve complete remission was 150.39 ± 224.075 days. Most of the patients experienced relapse due to self-discontinuation of treatment. 55% had complete remission and 43% were in partial remission at the last follow-up session. In 65.96% of patients, treatment-associated side effects were observed. The patients treated with prednisolone alone had significantly more side effects than those using AZA as an adjuvant (80% vs 50%, respectively; P =0.030). The mean duration of follow-ups was longer for patients with side effects ( P < 0.01). Topical corticosteroids were used for all patients sometime during the treatment. No deaths were recorded. Conclusion Prescribing low-dose prednisolone and adding AZA in nonresponding cases has good clinical outcomes for the treatment of oral lesions of PV. Adjuvant therapy can avoid the increase in corticosteroid dosage and side effects. The treatment method described in this study can be a helpful guide for clinicians, especially when other immunosuppressive drugs are not available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.