Peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) is a considerable problem in certain developing nations. Current diagnostic tests for peritoneal TB are difficult and time-consuming. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an adenosine deaminase (ADA) assay and the QuantiFERON-Gold (QFT-G) assay in the rapid diagnosis of TB peritonitis. Forty-one patients with a presumptive diagnosis of TB peritonitis with ascites were admitted to Mansoura University Hospital and included in the study. Ascitic fluid and blood samples were collected from each patient. Fluid samples were examined biochemically (protein concentration), cytologically (white blood cell count) and microbiologically (Ziehl-Neelsen stain and TB culture in Lö wenstein-Jensen media), and ADA levels were determined using colorimetry. Interferon-c levels in whole-blood samples were measured using the QFT-G assay. Fourteen (34 %) patients received a final clinical diagnosis of TB peritonitis; these patients were subclassified as definite (positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis; eight patients), highly probable (four patients) and probable (two patients) for TB peritonitis. Of the 14 patients with a final clinical diagnosis of TB peritonitis, 3 (21 %) tested positive using an acid-fast bacilli smear, which showed a sensitivity of 21 % and a specificity of 100 %. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that a cut-off value of 35 IU l "1 for the ADA level produced the best results as a diagnostic test for TB peritonitis, yielding the following parameter values: sensitivity 100 %, specificity 92.6 %, positive predictive value (PPV) 87.5 % and negative predictive value (NPV) 100 %. The QFT-G assay yielded the following values: sensitivity 92.9 %, specificity 100 %, PPV 100 % and NPV 96.4 %. The ADA and QFT-G assays might be used to rapidly diagnose TB peritonitis and initiate prompt treatment while waiting for a final diagnosis using the standard culture approach.

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune polyarticular disease. Despite being commonly affected in RA, the ankle and foot do not receive much attention, particularly in early disease. The precise diagnosis of their involvement and its impact on health is a clinical challenge that requires accurate assessment. Aim To determine the role of ultrasound in evaluation of ankle and foot pathologies and assess its impact on functional activity in newly diagnosed RA patients. Methods The study was conducted on 152 RA patients and 52 healthy controls. Patients were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and ultrasound scan. Impact on health was measured by health assessment questionnaire, as well as foot function index. Results In a cohort of patients with early RA with median duration of 1 month, tibialis posterior (TP) tenosynovitis (45.4%) was the most common pathology, followed by tibiotalar (TTJ) synovitis (39.8%), and peroneal tenosynovitis (39.1%). In terms of disease duration, TTJ (P = .001) foot pathologies were less common in early RA and tended to worsen over time, whereas TP (P = .048) and peroneal tenosynovitis (P = .011) were more common in early RA. In multivariate analysis TTJ, subtalar synovitis, forefoot pathologies, TP tenosynovitis, and Achilles enthesitis were found to be significant predictors of functional disability. The most important predictors of ankle pain were TTJ synovitis, TP tenosynovitis, peroneal tenosynovitis, and plantar fasciitis. Conclusion Ankle and foot involvement is a common issue of early RA, and it has a significant impact on quality of life. Ultrasound is a reliable tool for evaluating various abnormalities in this complex area, allowing for better management.

No abstract

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic disease which results in chronic inflammation that primarily involves synovial joints resulting in progressive joint destruction [1]. Detection of subclinical disease activity is important as radiographic progression was observed during remission course in some cases [2]. Ultrasound can detect subclinical activity and synovial inflammation, which predict relapse and radiographic progression [3].Matrix Metaloprotinase 3 (MMP-3) is an enzyme, which is involved in joint destruction in RA patients. MMP-3 was found to correlate with disease activity, joint erosions, radiographic progression, drug responsiveness and disease outcome in patients with active RA [4]. However no data about its role in detection of subclinical activity in patients with clinical remission.Objectives:To assess the role of MMP-3 as a marker to discriminate subclinical activity from ultrasound remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients with remission.Methods:This study was conducted on 45 RA patients fulfilling remission or low disease activity criteria according to DAS 28 AND 45 healthy controls. Ultrasound evaluation was done for all patients using modified German US7 score. According to US7 score patients were classified into two groups: group with sonographic remission in which GS is 0±1 and the other group with subclinical disease activity with higher GS. Both groups underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation including MMP-3.Results:Sonographic remission was achieved in 44% of patients (20 patients). There was no statistically significant difference as regard age, gender, smoking, disease duration, morning stiffness duration, CDAI, treatment and laboratory data apart from hemoglobin level between patients with subclinical disease activity and patients with remission. However, there is statistically significant difference between the two groups as regard joint deformity, extra articular manifestations, DAS 28, SDAI and hemoglobin level.There was statistically significant difference in serum MMP-3 between RA patients and healthy control group. Serum MMP-3 was higher in RA patients with subclinical activity than patients with sonographic remission but the difference was not statistically significant (figure 1). Serum MMP-3 was positively correlated with ESR and synovitis score.Figure 1.Conclusion:Serum MMP-3 has correlation with US synovitis score. However, serum MMP-3 was not able to differentiate patients with sonographic remission from patients with subclinical disease activity. Ultrasound is still the gold standard for detection of subclinical disease activity.References:[1]Ergin, S. (2000). “Romatoid Artrit ve Sjögren Sendromu.” Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon, Güneş Kitapevi: 1549-1576.[2]Ogishima, H., H. Tsuboi, N. Umeda, M. Horikoshi, Y. Kondo, M. Sugihara, T. Suzuki, I. Matsumoto and T. Sumida (2014). “Analysis of subclinical synovitis detected by ultrasonography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.” Modern rheumatology24(1): 60-68.[3]Filippucci, E., E. Cipolletta, R. M. Mirza, M. Carotti, A. Giovagnoni, F. Salaffi, M. Tardella, A. Di Matteo and M. Di Carlo (2019). “Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis.” La radiologia medica124(11): 1087-1100.[4]Lerner, A., S. Neidhöfer, S. Reuter and T. Matthias (2018). “MMP3 is a reliable marker for disease activity, radiological monitoring, disease outcome predictability, and therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology32(4): 550-562.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

No abstract