The estimation of the standard liver volume (SLV) is an important component of the evaluation of potential living liver donors and the surgical planning for resection for tumors. At least 16 different formulas for estimating SLV have been published in the worldwide literature. More recently, several proprietary software-assisted image postprocessing (SAIP) programs have been developed to provide accurate volume measurements based on the actual anatomy of a specific patient. Using SAIP, we measured SLV in 375 healthy potential liver donors and compared the results to SLV values that were estimated with the previously published formulas and each donor's demographic and anthropomorphic data. The percentage errors of the 16 SLV formulas versus SAIP varied by more than 59% (from À21.6% to þ37.7%). One formula was not statistically different from SAIP with respect to the percentage error (À1.2%), and another formula was not statistically different with respect to the absolute liver volume (18 mL). More than 75% of the estimated SLV values produced by these 2 formulas had percentage errors within 615%, and the formulas provided good predictions within acceptable agreement (615%) on scatter plots. Because of the wide variability, care must be taken when a formula is being chosen for estimating SLV, but the 2 aforementioned formulas provided the most accurate results with our patient demographics.

2 )] for donors with unusual PV branching. We compared the calculated RHLV with RHLV estimated with software-assisted CT (SACT) volumetry and actual graft weight after rightlobe donation in 200 right-lobe donors. This study confirmed that accurate estimates of RHLV can be achieved by SACT volumetry or by the simple method of Lee but using the SLV of only 3 of the 15 published formulas (Lin or Vauthey using body weight or body surface area) rather than Urata's. Our modification of the Lee's formula using RA and RP, PV diameters was also accurate and not different from Lee's formula. These simplified formulas may be used for donor screening for graft size adequacy before expensive evaluation proceeds.

No abstract

No abstract

Preoperative enteric screening for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriaceae was conducted in 360 patients prospectively observed for surgical site infection (SSI). ESBL colonization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.4) and dirty wound classification (aOR, 3.6) were associated with SSI; no association between carbapenem prophylaxis and reduction in SSI was detected.