PURPOSE Clinical breast examination (CBE) is one of the most common methods used for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries. CBE alone is limited by lack of specificity and may result in unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We evaluated the feasibility of integrating CBE, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in triaging palpable breast masses for specialized cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS An intensive breast cancer screening event was conducted at a national trade fair by a multidisciplinary team of care providers targeting a healthy population in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. All adults age ≥ 18 years were invited to participate. CBE was performed by oncologists and/or pathologists. FNAB was performed by a pathologist on palpable masses that were then categorized as benign, indeterminate, or suspicious for malignancy or definitively malignant based on ROSE. RESULTS A total of 208 individuals (207 females, one male; median age, 36 years; range, 18-68 years) were screened. Most (90.8%, 189 of 208) had normal findings, whereas 7.2% (15 of 208), 1% (2 of 208), and 1% (2 of 208) had a palpable mass, breast pain, and nipple discharge, respectively. Two participants had lesions too small for palpation-guided biopsy and clinically consistent with fibroadenomas; the participants were counseled, and observation was recommended. FNAB was performed on 13 breast masses, with 9 of 13 (69%) categorized as benign and 4 of 13 (31%) suspicious for malignancy. Final cytopathologic review of referred patients confirmed one case to be breast adenocarcinoma, one was suggestive of fibroadenoma, and two showed inflammations. CONCLUSION Integration of CBE with ROSE and FNAB was feasible in a breast cancer screening program in Tanzania. In settings with constrained resources for cancer care, this may be an effective method for triaging patients with breast masses.

Context.— Breast cancer biomarker assessment is critical in determining treatment and prognosis. In Tanzania, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is limited to surgical specimens and core biopsies. However, performing IHC on fine-needle aspiration biopsy cell blocks would offer numerous advantages. Objective.— To compare the performance between estrogen receptor (ER) IHC performed at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Tanzania and ER IHC performed at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), to demonstrate feasibility of performing IHC using cell blocks in Tanzania. Design.— Patients with breast masses were recruited prospectively from the fine-needle aspiration biopsy clinic at MNH. Estrogen receptor IHC results on cell blocks, performed at both MNH and UCSF, and corresponding tissue blocks, performed at MNH, were compared to determine concordance. Results.— Eighty-six cell blocks were evaluated by ER IHC at MNH, with 41 of 86 (47.7%) positive and 45 of 86 (52.3%) negative. Among 65 UCSF and MNH cell block pairs, overall ER IHC concordance was 93.8% (61 of 65) and positive concordance was 93.5% (29 of 31) (κ = 0.88, P > .99). Among 43 paired UCSF cell blocks and MNH tissue blocks, overall ER IHC concordance was 88.3% (38 of 43) and positive concordance was 90.5% (19 of 21) (κ = 0.77, P > .99). We compared 62 MNH cell block and tissue block pairs. Overall ER IHC concordance was 90.3% and positive concordance was 87.9% (κ = 0.81, P = .69). Conclusions.— Pairwise comparisons between ER IHC at MNH, on cell blocks and tissue blocks, with ER IHC at UCSF on cell blocks showed excellent concordance. We demonstrate that ER IHC on fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens can be implemented in resource-constrained settings.

No abstract

Context.— Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) is critical in determining sample adequacy and triaging cytology samples. Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the primary method of initial tissue sampling in Tanzania, ROSE is not practiced. Objective.— To investigate the performance of ROSE in determining cellular adequacy and providing preliminary diagnoses in breast FNAB in a low-resource setting. Design.— Patients with breast masses were recruited prospectively from the FNAB clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital. Each FNAB was evaluated by ROSE for overall specimen adequacy, cellularity, and preliminary diagnosis. The preliminary interpretation was compared to the final cytologic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis, when available. Results.— Fifty FNAB cases were evaluated, and all were adequate for diagnosis on ROSE and final interpretation. Overall percentage of agreement (OPA) between preliminary and final cytologic diagnosis was 86%, positive percentage of agreement (PPA) was 36%, and negative percentage of agreement (NPA) was 100% (κ = 0.5, P < .001). Twenty-one cases had correlating surgical resections. OPA between preliminary cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 67%, PPA was 22%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.2, P = .09). OPA between final cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 95%, PPA of 89%, and NPA of 100% (κ = 0.9, P = <.001). Conclusions.— False positive rates of ROSE diagnoses for breast FNAB are low. While preliminary cytologic diagnoses had a high false negative rate, final cytologic diagnoses had overall high concordance with histologic diagnoses. Therefore, the role of ROSE for preliminary diagnosis should be considered carefully in low-resource settings and may need to be paired with additional interventions to improve pathologic diagnosis.