The human auditory system is sensitive in detecting “mistuned” components in a harmonic complex, which do not match the frequency pattern defined by the fundamental frequency of the complex. Depending on the frequency configuration, the mistuned component may be perceptually segregated from the complex and may be heard as a separate tone. In the context of a masking experiment, mistuning a single component decreases its masked threshold. In this study we propose to quantify the ability to detect a single component for fixed amounts of mistuning by adaptively varying its level. This method produces masking release by mistuning that can be compared to other masking release effects. Detection thresholds were obtained for various frequency configurations where the target component was resolved or unresolved in the auditory system. The results from 6 normal-hearing listeners show a significant decrease of masked thresholds between harmonic and mistuned conditions in all configurations and provide evidence for the employment of different detection strategies for resolved and unresolved components. The data suggest that across-frequency processing is involved in the release from masking. The results emphasize the ability of this method to assess integrative aspects of pitch and harmonicity perception.
Compared to humans, Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) are much more sensitive at detecting mistuning of frequency components of a harmonic complex (Klinge and Klump. J Acoust Soc Am 128:280-290, 2010). One processing mechanism suggested to result in the high sensitivity involves evaluating the phase shift that gradually develops between the mistuned and the remaining components in the same or separate auditory filters. To investigate if this processing mechanism may explain the observed sensitivity, we determined the gerbils' thresholds to detect a constant phase shift in a component of a harmonic complex that is introduced without a frequency shift. The gerbils' detection thresholds for constant phase shifts were considerably lower for a high-frequency component (6,400 Hz) than for a low-frequency component (400 Hz) of a 200-Hz harmonic complex and increased with decreasing stimulus duration. Compared to the phase shifts calculated from the mistuning detection thresholds, the detection thresholds for constant phase shifts were similar to those for gradual phase shifts for the low-frequency harmonic but considerably lower for the high-frequency harmonic. A simulation of the processing of harmonic complexes by the gerbil's peripheral auditory filters when components are phase shifted shows waveform changes comparable to those assessed for mistuning detection Klinge and Klump (J Acoust Soc Am 128:280-290, 2010) and provides evidence that detection of the gradual phase shifts may underlie mistuning detection.
Harmonicity and spatial location provide eminent cues for the perceptual grouping of sounds. In general, harmonicity is a strong grouping cue. In contrast, spatial cues such as interaural phase or time difference provide for strong grouping of stimulus sequences but weak grouping for simultaneously presented sounds. By studying the neuronal basis underlying the interaction of these cues in processing simultaneous sounds using van Rossum spike train distance measures, we aim at explaining the interaction observed in psychophysical experiments. Responses to interaural phase differences imposed on single components of harmonic and mistuned complex tones as well as noise delay functions were recorded as multiunit responses from the inferior colliculus of Mongolian gerbils. Results revealed a better representation of interaural phase differences if imposed on a harmonic rather than a mistuned frequency component of a complex tone. The representation of interaural phase differences was better for long integration-time windows approximately reflecting firing rates rather than short integration-time windows reflecting the temporal pattern of the stimulus-driven response. We found only a weak impact of interaural phase differences if combined with mistuning of a component in a harmonic tone complex.
Objective: Evaluation of the self-perceived hearing impairment and performance after cochlear implantation in patients with definite Menière's disease (MD).Patients and Methods: Seventeen unilaterally or bilaterally profoundly hearingimpaired patients suffering from MD who received a cochlear implantat (CI) were eligible for inclusion in this study. Their self-perceived hearing impairment using the short Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) as well as their performance in speech perception (German language Freiburger mono-and multisyllable test, Oldenburger sentence test) were compared with a best-matched control group of non-MD patients up to 24 months of follow-up.Results: MD patients improved significantly in perception of monosyllables presented at 65 dB SPL , from preoperatively best aided 18.2% [2.4, 34.0] to 51.7% [39.4, 63.9] 1 year after cochlear implantation (mean [95% confidence interval]). Their performance approached the matched controls with 63. 2% [55.7, 70.8]. Monosyllables presented at a lower intensity of 55 dB SPL revealed a significant underperformance of the MD patients (21.1% [12.6, 29.6]) in contrast to the non-MD controls (39.1% [30.9, 47.4]) 12 months post-CI. Self-assessed hearing disability was significantly more pronounced in MD patients with a mean total SSQ12 score of 3.6 [2.4, 4.9] in comparison to 6. 1 [5.4, 6.8] of the matched non-MD controls after 12 months of cochlear implantation. Conclusion:Cochlear implantation substantially improves hearing capabilities in profoundly hearing-impaired patients with MD, but they tend to underperform in comparison to non-MD patients at least at lower sound pressure levels. This is likely one reason for the poorer self-assessed hearing function of cochlear implanted MD patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.