Aims and objectives: Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has routinely been performed in prone position in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) with nephrolithiasis. The objectives of our present study is to ensure optimum access to the renal collecting system, reducing operative time, and anesthetic morbidity during supine PCNL in ADPKD with nephrolithiasis. Methods: Seven patients were selected randomly. There were no preference for age, gender, size, location and laterality of stone, or BMI . All the patients fit into the AUA guideline criteria for management by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Preoperative, perioperative, and follow up data were collected prospectively. Results: Seven patients underwent supine PCNL in approximately 2.5 year in modified supine position. There was no intraoperative, post operative, or on follow up complications in any patient. In all the patients stones were cleared completely in single sitting. Conclusions: Supine PCNL in ADPKD with nephrolithiasis is an alternative with similar outcomes to the standard prone PCNL. It provides an additional benefit of performing the procedure in a single position, which is known to reduce total operating time, less anesthesia related complications, less neuromusculoskeletal injury, and reduce physical strain on operating

Objective: Objective of this case series is accurate access to the respective calyx with stone in horseshoe kidney while performing percutaneous nephrolithotmy in supine position. Reducing operative time and anaesthetic morbidity while performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney with nephrolithiasis in supine position. Materials and Methods: Four patient with one having bilateral renal calculi with horshoe kidney were selected randomly. There were no preference for age, gender; size, location and laterality of stone or BMI. All the patients fit into the AUA guideline criteria for management by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Preoperative, perioperative and follow up data were collected. Results: Four patients with one having bilateral renal calculi underwent supine tubeless PCNL in 1 year in GMSV position. There was no intraoperative, post operative or on follow up complications in any patient. In all the patients stones were cleared completely in single setting. Conclusion: Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney is an alternative to the standard prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the horseshoe kidney. It provides an additional benefit of performing the procedure in a single position, which is known to reduce total operating time, less anaesthesia related complications and less neuromusculoskeletal injury.

Aims and objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is treatment of choice now a days in patients with spinal deformity with large kidney stones. Objectives of our present study to compare in which position it is better to perform and costs minimum complications after surgery. Methods: A total of 14 patients with spinal deformity having nephrolithiasis were selected randomly. No preferences for age, gender, size, location, and laterality of stone or BMI. All the patients were fit according to AUA guideline criteria for management by PCNL. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected in all operated patients. Descriptive statistics were performed as means, standard deviations, and ranges using Microsoft excel. For categorical variables percentage were used. Results: A total of 14 patients with spinal deformity having nephrolithiasis underwent PCNL. Seven patients operated in prone position and seven patients operated in modified supine position within approximately 2 years. As compared to prone position in supine position there were reduced operative time, little or no change in Hb concentration, shorter hospital stay, little intraoperative blood loss, and higher significant stone free rate were detected. Conclusions: Supine PCNL in spinal deformity patients with nephrolithiasis is an alternative to the standard prone PCNL. It provides an additional benefit of large operative field performing the procedure in a single position, reduces total operating time, less anesthesia related complications, less neuromusculoskeletal injury, and reduce physical strain on operating surgeon.