This article examines the involvement of ministries of health in making health service coverage decisions in Denmark, England, France and Germany. The study aims to inform debate inEngland about the feasibility of reducing perceived ministerial and bureaucratic 'interference' in decisions affecting the National Health Service, based on interviews with senior government officials and other health system stakeholders. Ministries of health differ in their involvement in health system governance and coverage decisions ('the benefits package'), reflecting differences in institutional arrangements. In all four countries, organizations at arm's length or independent from government are either involved in providing technical advice to the ministry of health or have been mandated to take these decisions themselves. However, ministries of health occasionally intervene in the decisionmaking process or ignore the advice of these organizations. The Department of Health in England is not an aberrant case, at least in relation to coverage decisions. Indeed, ministries of health in Denmark and France play a larger role in making these decisions. Public pressure, often amplified by the media, is a shared reason for ministerial and ministry involvement in all four countries. This dynamic may thus limit the feasibility of attempts to further separate the NHS from both the Department of Health and wider political pressures. IntroductionThis article examines the role of ministries of health in making decisions about the range of collectively funded health services in four European countries.

Background: Moral distress is an unpleasant feeling that arises when one is forced to behave in such a way that it violates one’s personal beliefs and values about what is right and what is wrong. Moral distress, unlike other forms of distress, contains an incompatible conflict between one’s personal moral limitations and the acts that accompany it. Objective: to investigate moral distress and its effects on the ICU nursing staff, their professional quality of life as well as, related factors. Methods: The total sample of this cross-sectional study comprised of 258 ICU nurses working in reference hospitals for COVID 19 recruited online using google forms. The study tools are: a) “Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP)” to assess intensity and frequency of moral distress b) “Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL-5)” to assess professional quality of life. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25,0 (IBM Analytics, IBM Software Group Statistical Package). Results: Overall MMD-HP score ranged from 3 to 262 with a mean score of 116.52 (SD= 68.56). Distress score ranged from 5 to 79 with a mean score of 43.67 (SD=17.44) while intensity score ranged from 3 to 108 with a mean score 52.04 (SD=22.69). Bivariate analysis showed there is a statistically significant positive correlation between the intensity of moral distress and overall moral distress score with years of service in ICU and age. Nurses’ Assistants (m=48.1 p=0.021) scored higher than Registered nurses in distress and intensity score (m=54.1 p=0.020) while female also scored higher in overall MMD-HP (m=121.2 p=0.049). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, showed that secondary trauma scale was independently associated with a higher distress scale score and a higher MMD-HP. Conclusion: Educational support that provide information about dealing with moral distress during the coronavirus pandemic and how ICU nurses should deal with ethical issues that may confront in the everyday professional life is essential. Hospitals should monitor moral distress and there should be workshops that could build moral resilience and maintain high professional quality of life.

Background The continuously increasing survivorship of female breast cancer makes the monitoring and improvement of patients’ quality of life ever so important. While globally there is a growing body of research on health-related quality of life 1 year after surgical treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer, up-to-date information regarding Greek patients is scarce. Objective To measure the level of QoL of non-metastatic BC survivors in Greece 1 year after surgery. Methods A sample of 200 female breast cancer survivors aged 18 to 75, who followed up as outpatients in five public hospitals were included in this cross-sectional study. All recruited patients agreed to participate in the study (100% response rate). Quality of life data were collected through the EORTC QLQ-C30 as well as BR23 questionnaires. Results Cronbach’s alpha for all scales of the two questionnaires was from 0.551 to 0.936 indicating very good reliability. According to the Multiple Linear Regression, older patients showed a lower future perspective (p = .031), with those living in rural areas, which was associated with more financial difficulties (p = .001). Women with tertiary education and those who had been hospitalized in a university hospital recorded better on global health status (p = .003 and .000 respectively). Patients who underwent chemotherapy reported better scores in the emotional function sub-scale (p = .025). Women with reconstruction and at least one complication appeared to have significantly better scores in future perspective and social function (p = .005, .002 respectively). Conclusions Breast cancer survivors were found to have an overall good quality of life, functioning/symptoms scores and were satisfied with the provided care.

Greece has enacted three major health care reforms since the National Health System (NHS) was established in 1983. These reforms were designed to improve the system's ability to realize its founding principles of equity and efficiency in the delivery and financing of health services. This article presents an early report of ongoing doctoral research that aims to examine the relative influence of medical professional organizations versus other interests on these reforms. The article outlines three theoretical frameworks for understanding the health care system and the role of the medical profession within it in order to establish which best explains the nature and extent of health care reform. These frameworks are: sociological theories of professions; historical institutionalism; and structural interest theory.