Aim: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious health concern. We set out to investigate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) at admission for predicting the need for computed tomography (CT) in mild-TBI. Materials & methods: A retrospective study of adult patients who presented with mild-TBI Results: One hundred and thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-four patients had positive CT-findings. The mean NLR-levels at presentations were 5.6 ± 4.8. Patients with positive CT-findings had significant higher NLR-levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted and the threshold of NLR-levels for detecting the cases with positive CT-findings was 2.5, with 78.1% sensitivity and 63% specificity Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge no previous study has assessed the value of NLR-levels for predicting the need for CT in mild-TBI.
Traumatic brain injury has been associated with increased blood glucose levels. In the present study, we set out to investigate if blood glucose level in mild head trauma could predict the need for CT. One hundred fifty-nine patients with minor TBI (GCS 13-15) and a mean age of 44.8±23.8 years were included in the study. The most common mechanism of trauma was falls. Patients with positive CT findings had significantly higher glucose levels than patients with negative CT findings. Using ROC curve analysis, serum glucose levels higher than 120 mg dl-1 were the optimal cutoff value for the detection of patients with positive CT findings with a sensitivity of 74.4% and a specificity of 90.7%. Serum glucose level evaluation at presentation in the emergency department may aid CT decision-making in mild TBI.
Aim: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a public health issue of increasing incidence. Coagulopathy after TBI is a frequent event, associated with a poor prognosis, and biomarkers that could predict coagulopathy occurrence are needed. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is useful as a cost-effective biomarker to assess prognosis and the need for cranial computed tomography in patients with mild TBI. As no study has yet evaluated the association of NLR with coagulopathy, we investigated whether the NLR at presentation could predict coagulopathy occurrence after TBI. Materials & methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients aged >18 years who attended the emergency department (ED) with TBI, over a 3-year period. We included all patients for whom the NLR at presentation was available, and who underwent a brain CT scan. Results: The study included 173 patients (mean age 57.4 ± 21.1 years) with TBI, the most frequent cause of which was a fall. According to the Glasgow Coma Scale, 37 patients had severe TBI, 19 moderate and 117 mild TBI and 40 patients (23.1%) developed coagulopathy. Their mean NLR was 7.5 ± 6.7. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a cut-off value of 4.2 for NLR had 87.5% sensitivity and 52.9% specificity for predicting coagulopathy occurrence. Conclusion: Coagulopathy occurs frequently after TBI. This study investigated the value of NLR as a biomarker to predict coagulopathy occurrence, and concluded that NLR might be a novel and inexpensive biomarker for decision making in the management of TBI. Combination of NLR with other low-cost biomarkers and the clinical findings might further increase accuracy in the prediction of coagulopathy.
Although computed tomography (CT) is indicative of moderate and severe head trauma, minor head trauma constitutes a challenge, in differentiating patients in need for CT and those to be reassured and discharged in the emergency department. "
IntroductionGiant cell arteritis is the most common form of large-vessel vasculitides. However, it is probable that extracranial involvement is underdiagnosed in patients with classical giant cell arteritis. In the recent literature most cases of giant cell arteritis have been described in conjunction with aortic aneurysms or dissections. Nonetheless the coexistence of giant cell arteritis and retroperitoneal fibrosis is extremely rare. Here, we describe a case of giant cell arteritis at a very early clinical stage, in a woman with coexistence of retroperitoneal fibrosis.Case presentationWe report a case of giant cell arteritis at a very early clinical stage, in a 47-year-old Greek woman with coexistence of retroperitoneal fibrosis who was admitted to our hospital with a history of high-grade fever and mild right periumbilical abdominal pain for the past 30 days. In the context of fever of unknown origin, an abdomen computed tomography was ordered. A temporal artery biopsy was also performed because during hospitalization she complained of a headache. Examination of eosin and hematoxylin slides from biopsy specimens of her temporal artery, showed lesions consisting of predominantly lymphocytes, few plasma cells and occasional polymorphonuclear leucocytes. In addition no giant cells were detected in examining biopsies at multiple levels. This was consistent with giant cell arteritis according to the American college of Rheumatology criteria. An abdomen computed tomography revealed the presence of a retroperitoneal soft-tissue mass located anteriorly to the upper infrarenal aorta at the site of the scintigraphic uptake. The computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the mass were consistent with retroperitoneal fibrosis, and its morphology suggestive of benignity. Our patient started oral prednisolone and was afebrile from day one.ConclusionsIn our experience this is the first case of retroperitoneal fibrosis due to giant cell arteritis occurring at the same time. Involvement of the aorta (aortitis) and its branches has been also observed in a subset of patients with giant cell arteritis. In addition, giant cell arteritis has been associated with a markedly increased risk of aortic aneurysm particularly thoracic aortic aneurysm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.