BackgroundPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for renal calculi, and nephrostomy tubes lead to postoperative pain after PCNL. Regional techniques (e.g., epidural analgesia and peripheral blocks) and opioids are applied for postoperative pain treatment. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block (PVB) and tramadol on postoperative pain in patients who underwent PCNL.MethodFifty-three patients were included in this prospective randomized study. The patients were allocated into two groups: the PVB group (group P, n = 26) and the tramadol group (group T, n = 27). All patients were administered standard general anaesthesia. Ultrasound-guided PVB was performed at the T11- L1 levels using 0.5% bupivacaine for a total dose of 15 mL in group P. Patients in group T were intravenously administered a loading dose of 1 mg/kg tramadol. Patients in both groups were given patient-controlled analgesia. Haemodynamic parameters, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, side effects, and complications, tramadol consumption and additional analgesic requirements of the patients were recorded after surgery.ResultsHaemodynamic parameters were statistically similar between the groups. The VAS in group P were statistically lower than in group T. In the 24-h period after surgery, total PCA tramadol consumption was statistically lower in group P than in group T. The use of supplemental analgesic in group T was higher than in group P.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided PVB was found to be an effective analgesia compared to tramadol, and no additional complications were encountered.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02412930, date of registration: March 27, 2015, retrospectively registered.

Background/Aims: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lumbar plexus blockade with ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in elderly patients undergoing flank incision for urological surgery. Methods: 60 urological patients (>65 years old) were chosen randomly for paravertebral lumbar blockade. Postoperatively ropivacaine was used in group I (n = 30) and bupivacaine was administered in group II (n = 30) for lumbar plexus blockade. Heart rates, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, peripheral oxygen saturations, analgesia levels with visual analogue scales (VAS) were measured postoperatively at 5 and 30 min and 1, 3, 6, 8,and 12 h. Patient satisfaction scores and complications were recorded. Results: The hemodynamic parameters of the groups were in the normal ranges (p > 0.05). VAS were significantly decreased at 60 min in both groups (p < 0.05) and no important increase was observed during the first 8 h (p > 0.05). After the 8-hour measurement, analgesic was given to 7 patients in group I and 6 patients in group II (p < 0.05). There were no complications (p > 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were found to be higher for all patients (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In elderly patients, lumbar plexus blockade with ropivacaine can be a simple, safe and effective analgesic technique especially in the early postoperative period after urologic surgeries with flank incision.

Urinary hydatidosis is very rare and represents 2% to 4% of all cases of cystic echinococcosis. We present a case of a 21-yearold man with symptoms of frequency, urinary retention and reduced force in urinary stream due to cystic echinococcosis. Anti-Echinococcus granulosus antibodies were determined by echinococcosis western blotting, and pelvic computed tomography revealed a 11 × 14 × 10-cm retrovesical homogeneous cystic mass. The patient underwent surgical intervention; the cystic mass and retrovesical cavity were removed. After a 3-year follow-up period, there was no episode of lower urinary tract symptoms. This case illustrates that cystic echinococcosis should be considered in every case of cystic mass, especially in endemic countries, such as Turkey.

The efficiency and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia by using tramadol alone and combined with bupivacaine were investigated for postoperative pain treatment after major urological surgeries. For PCEA: in group I (n = 17) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol at a rate of 8 ml/h was given. In group II (n = 17), patients received an initial loading dose of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% and a supplemental continuous infusion of 8 ml/h. In group III (n = 17), a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% were given and a supplemental infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol in 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% combination was begun with a rate of 8 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 min was also used in all patients. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects was monitored at 0, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h of the postoperative period. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher’s exact, analysis of variance for repeated measurements and Tukey tests. The hemodynamic values and sedation scales were insignificantly different (p > 0.05). The adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. However VAS values were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II at every measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of side effects in all three groups was low (p > 0.05). In conclusion, we suggested that a combination of tramadol with bupivacaine can provide the most effective and safe postoperative analgesia with minimal risk for side effects.

We investigated whether bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment causes any hyporeactivity in rat vas deferens tissue and also whether vitamin E or sodium selenate has any restorative effect on this possible hyporesponsiveness. LPS treatment attenuated contractions to electrical field stimulation (EFS), phenylephrine, or ATP at the prostatic and epididymal ends. Treatment with the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor aminoguanidine or vitamin E could prevent the impairment in contractile responses of both ends to EFS and phenylephrine but sodium selenate could restore these impaired contractions at only the epididymal end. LPS treatment also caused a similar significantly impairment on purinergic or adrenergic component of nerve-evoked contractions in the presence of prazosin or suramin, respectively, and vitamin E or sodium selenate could restored this impairment at both ends. On the other hand, both antioxidant agents failed to restore the impaired ATP-induced contractions in LPS-treated rats at both ends. In conclusion, LPS-treatment caused a hyporeactivity in the rat vas deferens. A possible increased oxidative activity in the vas deferens may be a major reason for the impairment of contractile responses. The restorative effects of vitamin E and/or sodium selenate on this hypocontractility may depend on their antioxidant properties or their inhibitory action on the iNOS.