The naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players whoThe naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players who are of old age and cannot contribute to the Indonesian national team for a long time.

No abstract

Law Number 12 of 2008 violates the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 157(1) of Law Number 8 of 2015 stipulates that the settlement of disputes over the results of direct regional head elections is under the jurisdiction of a special court, but until the establishment of a special court, the Constitutional Court still has the power to resolve disputes over the results of direct elections. The results of the research are expected to be able to answer constitutional issues in Indonesia, especially regarding the urgency of the establishment of a special court for the election of regional heads and the extent to which the design model for special courts for the election of regional heads is in order to ensure the quality of democracy. In addition, as a discourse for students who are in the field of Constitutional Law, it requires constructive thinking. This research uses a normative juridical approach which emphasizes literature research. The portrait of dispute resolution on the results of regional head elections continues to experience dynamics along with interpretations of the institutionalization of regional head elections as part of the general election regime or not.

In applying the burden of proof of customs valuation disputes in the Indonesian tax court, some judges place the burden of proof to the importers, while others distribute the burden of proof to the customs administration. So, the legal problem that occurred in this study is regarding a different interpretation in applying the burden of proof. To solve that problem, it is necessary to research how the burden of proof applies in Tax Law through a comparative legal approach and research on how customs law regulates the burden of proof through a statute approach on WTO law and Indonesian customs law. The research results lead to one conclusion that the burden of proof can be shifted to companies or taxpayers if they cannot complete the evidence and documents required by tax or customs administration. However, the provision regarding the burden of proof for customs valuation is not clearly regulated in Indonesian Customs Law. Furthermore, the different interpretation in distributing the burden of proof among the judges is caused by the doctrine of freedom of proof based on tax court procedural law.

The implementation of religious court rulings related to the fulfillment of the rights of former wives and children has many obstacles that cause very few rulings to be successfully implemented. The existence of regulations governing the execution of existing rulings is quite outdated because it is still based on the regulations left by the Dutch East Indies Colonial. Breakthroughs in the field of execution such as dwangsom or delays in the pronunciation of talaq pledges to pressure the convicted have not shown significant and optimal results in overcoming this problem. Ideas emerged on opportunities for advances in information technology and integration of population administration that can be used to engineer compliance with the implementation of rulings in realizing the fulfillment of the rights of former wives and children after divorce. The research method used is normative juridical with a legal approach, case approach, historical approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The theories used include Authority Theory as Grand Theory, Legal Protection Theory as Middle Range Theory, and Legal Theory that Engineers Society as Applied Theory. The results of the study are the regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the execution of religious court decisions in the implementation of decisions related to the rights of former wives and children after divorce contained in laws and regulations both materially and formally as well as policy regulations. The existence of this legal basis has not been able to effectively guarantee the fulfillment of the rights of former wives and children after divorce. Strengthening the execution of religious courts needs to be carried out as a renewal that is able to overcome the problem of stagnant executions that exist today, especially the existing executions are still unable to be carried out simply, quickly, and at low cost. Strengthening the authority to implement decisions related to the rights of former wives and children by religious courts through the suspension of citizens' rights to the convicted is carried out by utilizing the development of information technology and the integration of population databases to improve compliance and successful execution of religious court decisions. Social engineering by marrying law and information technology will be able to strengthen the authority to carry out executions by religious courts so as to create legal protection that is certain and fair for ex-wives and children after divorce.