Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in one tertiary hospital in Nepal.Methods: Retrospective study was done for all patients that underwent bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center from January 2010 to December 2017. The study included 36 male and 16 female patients with totalof 104renal units at an average age of 37 years (range 3 -65 years). Five patients were planned for bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but intraoperatively the procedure was aborted after completion of only one side due to various factors. All PCNL were performed in prone position under general anesthesia.Results: In91.2% of the patients, bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy could be performed as planned. Average time required for bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 94 ± 38.8mins (range 25 – 170 mins) with average hemoglobin drop of 1.85 ± 1.30gm% (range 0.1 - 4.2gm%) and no significant change in serum creatinine levels. Multiple access tracts (>1) had to be created in 3 renal units. Most of the renal stones were Guy’s stone score (GSS) 1 and 2 whereas 15.4% were GSS of 3 and 4.Overall stone free rate was 94% with significant residual stones (>4mm) in 6 renal units which were subjected to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) on a later date (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). Bladder clot evacuation was done in one patient (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-b). Blood transfusion was required in two patients and two patients developed postoperative sepsis (Clavien-Dindo Grade: II). One patient developed hydrothorax which was managed successfully (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). Conclusions: Bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is feasible and safe procedure, given that the patients are appropriately selected based upon Guy’s stone score, stone burden, pelvi-calyceal anatomy and overall health status.Keywords: Bilateral simultaneous;endourology; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; urolithiasis.

In recent years, the use of retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) for the management of nephrolithiasis is on the rise worldwide. It is commonly considered a safe procedure with lesser complications. The current study aimed to study the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and urosepsis following retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS). This is the retrospective observational study among 356 patients who underwent RIRS and 52 were readmitted as 36 developed SIRS and 16 developed urosepsis as a complication in last 5 years (July 1st 2016 –June 30th 2021) in department of Urology of B&B hospital, Kathmandu. It is found that only post-operative urine culture had significant association with SIRS with p- value (< 0.00). There was no normality in the data so Mann Whitney U test was applied to test the significant difference in the median values of some quantitative variables between the SIRS and No SIRS group. There was significant difference between the median values of stone volume and duration of fragmentation with p values 0.001 and 0.002 respectively. There was no variables that was found to be associated with urosepsis.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is an effective and safe method for the management of intrarenal stone showing high stone-free rates. Its main advantage is decrease in operative morbidity for the patient, as well as a faster recovery. The current study aimed to study the factors influencing operating time during retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone in tertiary care hospital. It is an observational descriptive cross sectional study using purposive sampling method which was conducted among 188 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for management of nephrolithiasis in Department of Urology of B&B hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal. The baseline information of the factors affecting operating time were obtained like age, gender, site of renal stone, prestented or not, body mass index (BMI), ureteral access sheath (UAS) use, stone volume and stone density. The mean operating time was high in renal stone with calcium ammonium urate composition. On linear regression analysis, operative times significantly increased with greater stone volumes and also pre-stenting and ureteral access sheath use did significantly difference on operative time. It revealed stone volume to be the most significant predictor of operative time. Thus, the present study provides valuable information regarding the factors influencing operating time during retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone.