Modifications of the INSS and INRC made at this conference are presented. In addition, proposals are made for future modifications in these criteria and for the development of International Neuroblastoma Risk Groups.

The Third National Wilms' Tumor Study sought to reduce treatment for low-risk patients and find better chemotherapy for those at high risk for relapse. Eligible patients (1439) were randomized according to stage (I-IV) and histology (favorable [FH] or unfavorable [UH]), and contributed data to survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) analyses. Four-year (postnephrectomy) survival percentages and randomized treatment regimens for low-risk patients were 96.5% for 607 Stage I/FH patients who received dactinomycin (Actinomycin D [AMD], Merck Sharp & Dohme, West Point, PA) and vincristine (VCR) for 10 weeks versus 6 months; 92.2% for 278 Stage II/FH patients; and 86.9% for 275 Stage III/FH patients who received AMD + VCR +/- Adriamycin (ADR, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) for 15 months. Stage II/FH patients also had either zero or 2000 cGy irradiation (RT) postoperatively and Stage III/FH patients either 1000 or 2000 cGy. Four-year survival was 73.0% for 279 high-risk patients (any Stage IV, all UH) who received postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and AMD + VCR + ADR +/- cyclophosphamide (CPM). Statistical analysis of survival and RFS experience shows that the less intensive therapy does not worsen results for low-risk patients and CPM does not benefit those at high risk.

Neuroblastoma is one of the most common tumors in childhood. However, it often has been difficult to compare clinical and laboratory studies of this disease due to a lack of uniform criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response. An international group of conferees addressed each of these issues and reached a consensus. Specific criteria for making a diagnosis of neuroblastoma are defined. A new neuroblastoma staging system is proposed that takes into account the most important elements of current but incompatible systems. Finally, criteria for response to treatment are standardized. The criteria proposed herein represent an international consensus of essentially every major pediatric oncology group or organization in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The staging system should be referred to as the International Neuroblastoma Staging System, and the response criteria as the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria. Implementation of these criteria will greatly facilitate the comparison of clinical and laboratory studies by different groups and countries. Furthermore, these criteria should serve as a foundation on which future modifications or improvements can be based.

A clinical staging of patients with neuroblastoma is proposed. Such staging is desirable to aid in estimating the prognosis and to be able to evaluate the efficacy of differing therapeutic regimens by analyzing results obtained in comparable groups of patients. That the suggested staging is practical is illustrated by the ease with which 100 children with neuroblastoma, entered in previous studies by Children's Cancer Study Group A, were staged using the criteria described. Short‐term survival data of this small sample demonstrated, in addition, that the proposed staging appears to be of help in estimating the prognosis. Also proposed is a list of investigations which aid in accurate staging.