No abstract

In a rapidly growing and aging population, heart failure (HF) has become recognised as a public health concern that imposes high economic and societal costs worldwide. HF management stems from the use of highly cost-effective angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and β-blockers to the use of newer drugs such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), ivabradine, and vericiguat. Modelling studies of pharmacological treatments that report on cost effectiveness in HF is important in order to guide clinical decision making. Multiple cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) suggests that it is not only cost-effective and has the potential to improve long-term clinical outcomes, but is also likely to meet conventional cost-effectiveness thresholds in many countries. Similar promising results have also been shown for vericiguat while a cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of empagliflozin has shown cost effectiveness in HF patients with Type 2 diabetes. Despite the recent FDA approval of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HF, it might take time for these SGLT2i to be widely used in real-world practice. A recent economic evaluation of vericiguat found it to be cost effective at a higher cost per QALY threshold than SGLT2i. However, there is a lack of clinical or real-world data regarding whether vericiguat would be prescribed on top of newer treatments or in lieu of them. Sacubitril/valsartan has been commonly compared to enalapril in cost effectiveness analysis and has been found to be similar to that of SGLT2i but was not considered a cost-effective treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Thailand and Singapore with the current economic evaluation evidences. In order for more precise analysis on cost effectiveness analysis, it is necessary to take into account the income level of various countries as it is certainly easier to allocate more financial resources for the intervention, with greater effectiveness, in high- and middle-income countries than in low-income countries. This review aims to evaluate evidence and cost effectiveness studies in more recent HF drugs i.e., SGLT2i, ARNi, ivabradine, vericiguat and omecamtiv, and gaps in current literature on pharmacoeconomic studies in HF.

Background While patients’ preferences in primary care have been examined in numerous conjoint analyses, there has been little systematic effort to synthesise the findings. This review aimed to identify, to organise and to assess the strength of evidence for the attributes and factors associated with preference heterogeneity in conjoint analyses for primary care outpatient visits. Methods We searched five bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Econlit and Scopus) from inception until 15 December 2021, complemented by hand-searching. We included conjoint analyses for primary care outpatient visits. Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion and assessed the quality of all included studies using the checklist by ISPOR Task Force for Conjoint Analysis. We categorized the attributes of primary care based on Primary Care Monitoring System framework and factors based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Services Use. We then assessed the strength of evidence and direction of preference for the attributes of primary care, and factors affecting preference heterogeneity based on study quality and consistency in findings. Results Of 35 included studies, most (82.4%) were performed in high-income countries. Each study examined 3–8 attributes, mainly identified through literature reviews (n = 25). Only six examined visits for chronic conditions, with the rest on acute or non-specific / other conditions. Process attributes were more commonly examined than structure or outcome attributes. The three most commonly examined attributes were waiting time for appointment, out-of-pocket costs and ability to choose the providers they see. We identified 24/58 attributes with strong or moderate evidence of association with primary care uptake (e.g., various waiting times, out-of-pocket costs) and 4/43 factors with strong evidence of affecting preference heterogeneity (e.g., age, gender). Conclusions We found 35 conjoint analyses examining 58 attributes of primary care and 43 factors that potentially affect the preference of these attributes. The attributes and factors, stratified into evidence levels based on study quality and consistency, can guide the design of research or policies to improve patients’ uptake of primary care. We recommend future conjoint analyses to specify the types of visits and to define their attributes clearly, to facilitate consistent understanding among respondents and the design of interventions targeting them. Word Count: 346/350 words. Trial registration On Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m7ts9

In the era of “Bad Bugs, No Drugs,” optimizing antibiotic therapy against multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens is crucial. Mathematical modelling has been employed to further optimize dosing regimens. These models include mechanism-based PK/PD models, systems-based models, quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and population PK models. Quantitative systems pharmacology has significant potential in precision antimicrobial chemotherapy in the clinic. Population PK models have been employed in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Several antibiotics require close monitoring and dose adjustments in order to ensure optimal outcomes in patients with infectious diseases. Success or failure of antibiotic therapy is dependent on the patient, antibiotic and bacterium. For some drugs, treatment responses vary greatly between individuals due to genotype and disease characteristics. Thus, for these drugs, tailored dosing is required for successful therapy. With antibiotics, inappropriate dosing such as insufficient dosing may put patients at risk of therapeutic failure which could lead to mortality. Conversely, doses that are too high could lead to toxicities. Hence, precision dosing which customizes doses to individual patients is crucial for antibiotics especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. In this review, we discuss the various strategies in optimizing antimicrobial therapy to address the challenges in the management of infectious diseases and delivering personalized therapy.

Introduction: The emerging of antibiotic resistance has become a challenge to global health and there is a strong association between antibiotic consumption and incidence of resistance. One of the tools to monitor and identify antibiotic prescribing pattern is Point Prevalence Survey (PPS). Objectives: To determine the pattern of antibiotic prescribing in Primary Health Clinics (PHC) in Federal Territory Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya (FTKLP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at 17 PHCs in FTKLP using universal sampling. Data from prescriptions received were recorded in PPS-PC data collection form. The compliance of the antibiotics prescribed were determined via cross-referencing with the Malaysian National Antibiotic Guideline (NAG) 2014 and/or Clinical Pathway for Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in PHCs (CP) 2019. Results: A total of 338 prescriptions with antibiotics were received and the prescribing rate of antibiotics at the PHCs in FTKLP 2019 was 5.94%.Only 128 (37.9%) prescriptions with antibiotics prescribed were compliant with either the NAG or the CP while 33 (9.8%) prescriptions were found non-compliant with either guideline. Compliance of the remaining 177 prescriptions could not be determined due to non-specific diagnoses. The most commonly prescribed drug class was penicillin (n=198, 58.4%), followed by cephalosporins (n=80, 23.6%) and macrolides (n=41, 12%). Conclusion: This PPS study showed a low compliance of antibiotic prescribing to guidelines compared to recent studies and indicate the need for further action to be taken in order to improve antimicrobial prescribing in PHCs. KEYWORDS: Point prevalence survey, antibiotic, primary care